Comparison Overview

St. Thomas Public Library

VS

Eye on Asia

St. Thomas Public Library

153 Curtis St, St Thomas, N5P 3Z7, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Located in the heart of downtown St. Thomas, St. Thomas Public Library is your community hub for free access to technology, collections, services, resources, programs, and much more! As your library, we are committed to redefining what great library service looks like for St. Thomas. We hope you’ll stop by and visit us at 153 Curtis Street, St. Thomas, ON, Canada or visit us online at https://stthomaspubliclibrary.ca/ and see how the library can support your journey to lifelong learning. Find us on: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/stthomaspubliclibrary Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/stthomaspubliclibrary/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/stpl_library

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Eye on Asia

100 Victoria St, Singapore, 188064, SG
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Focusing on ASEAN countries, China and India including emerging Asian cities, Eye on Asia is a collaborative effort by the National Library Singapore with partners to provide resources for Singaporeans who wish to find out more about the region and explore internationalisation opportunities abroad. Our partners include Enterprise Singapore, Business China, International Trading Institute at Singapore Management University, GlobalConnect@SBF, McGraw-Hill Education (Asia), Nanyang Business School, Ngee Ann Polytechnic, OSG Youth Alliance, Singapore Global Network, Singapore Indian Chamber of Commerce & Industry, Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Temasek Polytechnic, The ASEAN Living Room, UAE Singapore Business Council, Yale-NUS College and Youth Corps Singapore.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-thomas-public-library.jpeg
St. Thomas Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nl-eye-on-asia.jpeg
Eye on Asia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Thomas Public Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eye on Asia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Thomas Public Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eye on Asia in 2025.

Incident History — St. Thomas Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Thomas Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eye on Asia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eye on Asia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-thomas-public-library.jpeg
St. Thomas Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nl-eye-on-asia.jpeg
Eye on Asia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

St. Thomas Public Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Eye on Asia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Eye on Asia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to St. Thomas Public Library company.

In the current year, Eye on Asia company and St. Thomas Public Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eye on Asia company nor St. Thomas Public Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Eye on Asia company nor St. Thomas Public Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Eye on Asia company nor St. Thomas Public Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St. Thomas Public Library company nor Eye on Asia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Thomas Public Library nor Eye on Asia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Eye on Asia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to St. Thomas Public Library company.

Neither St. Thomas Public Library nor Eye on Asia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Thomas Public Library nor Eye on Asia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Thomas Public Library nor Eye on Asia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Thomas Public Library nor Eye on Asia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Thomas Public Library nor Eye on Asia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Thomas Public Library nor Eye on Asia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H