Comparison Overview

ST TAMMANY PARISH

VS

Vlaamse overheid

ST TAMMANY PARISH

1505 N Florida St Covington, LA 70433, US
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

None

NAICS: 922
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2-10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Vlaamse overheid

Havenlaan 88 Brussels, Brussels Region, BE
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Excellent

Bij de Vlaamse overheid geef je elke dag opnieuw het beste van jezelf, in een job die een verschil maakt in de maatschappij. Pas afgestudeerd of al een aantal jaren professionele ervaring achter de rug? Op zoek naar een job als arbeider, bediende, leidinggevende, administratief medewerker, ingenieur of ICT-expert? Bij de Vlaamse overheid - de meest aantrekkelijke werkgever in de publieke sector volgens Randstad (2019) - vind je stuk voor stuk uitdagende functies in uiteenlopende vakgebieden, op verschillende locaties in Vlaanderen. Je talent en inzet vinden we veel belangrijker dan je geslacht, gender, afkomst, leeftijd, geaardheid, handicap of chronische ziekte. Stel je vandaag nog kandidaat en bouw mee aan het divers Vlaanderen van morgen. Meer weten over werken voor Vlaanderen en onze openstaande vacatures? www.werkenvoorvlaanderen.be Je kan er ook inschrijven op onze wekelijkse vacaturenieuwsbrief!

NAICS: 922
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-tammany-parish.jpeg
ST TAMMANY PARISH
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vlaamse-overheid.jpeg
Vlaamse overheid
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
ST TAMMANY PARISH
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vlaamse overheid
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ST TAMMANY PARISH in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vlaamse overheid in 2025.

Incident History โ€” ST TAMMANY PARISH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ST TAMMANY PARISH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Vlaamse overheid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vlaamse overheid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-tammany-parish.jpeg
ST TAMMANY PARISH
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vlaamse-overheid.jpeg
Vlaamse overheid
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ST TAMMANY PARISH company and Vlaamse overheid company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Vlaamse overheid company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ST TAMMANY PARISH company.

In the current year, Vlaamse overheid company and ST TAMMANY PARISH company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vlaamse overheid company nor ST TAMMANY PARISH company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Vlaamse overheid company nor ST TAMMANY PARISH company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vlaamse overheid company nor ST TAMMANY PARISH company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ST TAMMANY PARISH company nor Vlaamse overheid company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ST TAMMANY PARISH company nor Vlaamse overheid company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither ST TAMMANY PARISH company nor Vlaamse overheid company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X