Comparison Overview

St. Mary's Medical Center

VS

Brookdale

St. Mary's Medical Center

901 45th St, None, West Palm Beach, Florida, US, 33407
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 700 and 749

St. Mary’s Medical Center is a leader in critical care medicine, treating more than 70,000 emergency and trauma patients each year. Our hospital has multiple specialized programs, including a state-designated Regional Perinatal Intensive Care Center and Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. St. Mary’s Medical Center delivers the most babies in Palm Beach County. Our physicians, nurses and staff are dedicated to providing expert, compassionate care. The services we provide include emergency care, heart care, obstetrics, orthopedics, pediatrics, kidney dialysis, neurology, physical therapy, psychiatry, stroke treatment, wound care, diagnostic Imaging and bloodless medicine. St. Mary’s Medical Center has achieved top quality awards through The Birthplace, our level I trauma center, comprehensive stroke center, level III NICU and more. With advanced diagnostic and imaging services, St. Mary’s Medical Center is the only GE Show Site in the Southeastern United States for neurointerventional imaging technology.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 736
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Brookdale

111 Westwood Place, Brentwood, TN, 37027, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Relationships are the heart of our culture. They help us create a sense of family among our residents, associates and patients. Integrity is our soul. It guides us to be open in our communication with each other, and it enables us to make the right decisions for the people who have entrusted us with their care. Our relationships and our integrity work together to create a positive impact in the lives of the people we touch. The happiness of those we serve is dependent on the happiness of our associates, so you’ll receive competitive compensation and a benefits package with additional perks designed to make you smile. The work you do will be challenging yet rewarding. But you’ll earn more than a paycheck; you can enjoy opportunities to grow your career, as well as ongoing programs catered to your health, financial, mental, and emotional needs. Most of all, we believe you can find purpose, meaning, and the chance to be a part of something bigger than yourself. If you want to work in an environment where you can become the best you that’s possible, join us! www.brookdalecareers.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 20,157
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-mary-s-medical-center.jpeg
St. Mary's Medical Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brookdale-senior-living.jpeg
Brookdale
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Mary's Medical Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brookdale
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Mary's Medical Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brookdale in 2026.

Incident History — St. Mary's Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Mary's Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brookdale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brookdale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-mary-s-medical-center.jpeg
St. Mary's Medical Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brookdale-senior-living.jpeg
Brookdale
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Brookdale company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to St. Mary's Medical Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

St. Mary's Medical Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Brookdale company has not reported any.

In the current year, Brookdale company and St. Mary's Medical Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

St. Mary's Medical Center company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Brookdale company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Brookdale company nor St. Mary's Medical Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brookdale company nor St. Mary's Medical Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center company nor Brookdale company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Brookdale holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center company nor Brookdale company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Brookdale company employs more people globally than St. Mary's Medical Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Brookdale holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Brookdale holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Brookdale holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Brookdale holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Brookdale holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Brookdale holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N