Comparison Overview

St. Mary's Medical Center

VS

Aveanna Healthcare

St. Mary's Medical Center

901 45th St, None, West Palm Beach, Florida, US, 33407
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 700 and 749

St. Mary’s Medical Center is a leader in critical care medicine, treating more than 70,000 emergency and trauma patients each year. Our hospital has multiple specialized programs, including a state-designated Regional Perinatal Intensive Care Center and Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. St. Mary’s Medical Center delivers the most babies in Palm Beach County. Our physicians, nurses and staff are dedicated to providing expert, compassionate care. The services we provide include emergency care, heart care, obstetrics, orthopedics, pediatrics, kidney dialysis, neurology, physical therapy, psychiatry, stroke treatment, wound care, diagnostic Imaging and bloodless medicine. St. Mary’s Medical Center has achieved top quality awards through The Birthplace, our level I trauma center, comprehensive stroke center, level III NICU and more. With advanced diagnostic and imaging services, St. Mary’s Medical Center is the only GE Show Site in the Southeastern United States for neurointerventional imaging technology.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 736
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Aveanna Healthcare

400 Interstate North Pkwy SE, None, Atlanta, Georgia, US, 30339
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

About Aveanna It all started with a simple idea: How can we help people live better lives by providing better homecare? That idea became a company called Aveanna, dedicated to bringing new possibilities and new hope to those we serve. At Aveanna, we believe that the ultimate place for caring is right in the comfort of home. We are a new company that has quickly established itself as a pre-eminent, national leader in healthcare as well as homecare. We believe in clinical excellence, innovation, and compassionate care to every patient and family we are privileged to help. But what sets us apart most is our focus on the relationship between the caregiver and the patient. By surrounding our patients with superior resources, and by giving our caregivers better technology and training, we are able to provide superior care that makes a difference in what’s possible in outcomes and daily living. Aveanna’s leadership team has worked for more than 40 years building other great homecare companies on a national level. Now that experience is building the homecare company of the future. Today, Aveanna Healthcare cares for patients and families in 33 states through our rapidly growing network of more than 300 branch offices, offering a variety of care and services to more than 80,000 children and adults.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 12,268
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-mary-s-medical-center.jpeg
St. Mary's Medical Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aveanna-healthcare.jpeg
Aveanna Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Mary's Medical Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aveanna Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Mary's Medical Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aveanna Healthcare in 2025.

Incident History — St. Mary's Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Mary's Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aveanna Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aveanna Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-mary-s-medical-center.jpeg
St. Mary's Medical Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aveanna-healthcare.jpeg
Aveanna Healthcare
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Aveanna Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to St. Mary's Medical Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

St. Mary's Medical Center and Aveanna Healthcare have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Aveanna Healthcare company and St. Mary's Medical Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

St. Mary's Medical Center company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Aveanna Healthcare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Aveanna Healthcare company has disclosed at least one data breach, while St. Mary's Medical Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Aveanna Healthcare company nor St. Mary's Medical Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center company nor Aveanna Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Aveanna Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aveanna Healthcare company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to St. Mary's Medical Center company.

Aveanna Healthcare company employs more people globally than St. Mary's Medical Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Aveanna Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Aveanna Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Aveanna Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Aveanna Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Aveanna Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Mary's Medical Center nor Aveanna Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H