Comparison Overview

St. Luke's Health

VS

Lifespan

St. Luke's Health

6720 Bertner Ave., Houston, 77030, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

St. Luke’s Health, a member of CommonSpirit Health, is home to 16 hospitals in Texas that deliver excellent whole-person care with humankindness to the Brazos Valley, East Texas and Greater Houston. St. Luke's includes Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center, the joint venture research and teaching hospital for Baylor College of Medicine. Home to the nationally accredited and NCI-designated Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, St. Luke’s delivers nationally-recognized care within a Christian ministry of healing. Social Media Privacy Policy: http://bit.ly/2fpll4B

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 2,787
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
4

Lifespan

167 Point Street, Providence, RI, US, 02903
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Formed in 1994, Brown University Health (Formerly Lifespan) is a not-for-profit health system based in Providence, RI comprising three teaching hospitals of The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University: Rhode Island Hospital and its Hasbro Children's; The Miriam Hospital; and Bradley Hospital, the nation’s first psychiatric hospital for children; Newport Hospital, Saint Anne's Hospital and Morton Hospital, community hospitals offering a broad range of health services; Gateway Healthcare, the state’s largest provider of community behavioral health care; and Brown Health Medical Group, the largest multi-specialty practice in Rhode Island. Brown University Health teaching hospitals are among the country’s top recipients of research funding from the US National Institutes of Health. The hospitals received $145 million in external research funding in fiscal 2023. All Brown University Health hospitals are charitable organizations that depend on support from the community to provide programs and services.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 23,394
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-luke's-health.jpeg
St. Luke's Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifespanhealthsystem.jpeg
Lifespan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Luke's Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lifespan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Luke's Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lifespan in 2025.

Incident History — St. Luke's Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Luke's Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lifespan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lifespan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-luke's-health.jpeg
St. Luke's Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifespanhealthsystem.jpeg
Lifespan
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2022
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Encryption of data on servers
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Lifespan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to St. Luke's Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

St. Luke's Health company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Lifespan company.

In the current year, Lifespan company and St. Luke's Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Both Lifespan company and St. Luke's Health company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

St. Luke's Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Lifespan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

St. Luke's Health company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Lifespan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither St. Luke's Health company nor Lifespan company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Luke's Health nor Lifespan holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

St. Luke's Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lifespan company.

Lifespan company employs more people globally than St. Luke's Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither St. Luke's Health nor Lifespan holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Luke's Health nor Lifespan holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Luke's Health nor Lifespan holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Luke's Health nor Lifespan holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Luke's Health nor Lifespan holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Luke's Health nor Lifespan holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H