Comparison Overview

St. Lawrence Health

VS

UCSF Health

St. Lawrence Health

50 Leroy Street, Potsdam, New York, US, 13676
Last Update: 2025-12-09

St. Lawrence Health (SLH) was established in December 2013 with the mission to improve health and to expand access through coordination and integration of services. Canton-Potsdam Hospital, Potsdam; Gouverneur Hospital, Gouverneur; and Massena Hospital, Massena, operate under the umbrella of St. Lawrence Health. SLH became an affiliate of Rochester Regional Health (RRH) in January 2021. RRH is an internationally recognized integrated health services organization, and its industry distinctions include year-after-year Healthgrades awards, America’s 50 Best Hospitals™, multiple Magnet® Awards for nursing excellence, and the greatest number of Beacon Awards for Excellence of any hospital system in the nation. Canton-Potsdam Hospital (CPH) is a not-for-profit community hospital certified for 94 beds. Its core programs in emergency medicine, acute care, hospitalist medicine, critical care, and a Level III Trauma Center are supplemented by outpatient health services in Brasher Falls, Canton, Colton, Massena, Norfolk, Norwood, and Potsdam, NY. CPH offers specialty care in over 35 different specialties, including a robust orthopedic surgery and sports medicine program, and the Center for Cancer Care. Gouverneur Hospital, located in its namesake city in Northern New York, is a not-for-profit critical access hospital founded in 2013 and certified for 25 beds. Services include inpatient detox, substance use disorder rehabilitation, behavioral health services, emergency care, imaging and EKGs, physical rehabilitation, and respiratory therapy. Massena Hospital is a 25-bed community hospital providing inpatient, medical, and surgical services in addition to emergency care. MH’s main campus also provides imaging and laboratory services, nutritional counseling, respiratory care, and inpatient physical and speech therapies. cardiology, infusion, nephrology, neurology, OB-GYN and women’s health, pediatrics, and primary care.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 286
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

UCSF Health

505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, US, 94143
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 700 and 749

UCSF Health is an integrated health care network encompassing several entities, including UCSF Medical Center, one of the nation’s top 10 hospitals according to U.S. News & World Report, and UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospitals, with campuses in Oakland and San Francisco. We are recognized throughout the world for our innovative patient care, advanced technology and pioneering research. For more than a century, we have offered the highest quality medical treatment. Today, our expertise covers virtually all specialties, from cancer to women's health. In addition, the compassionate care provided by our doctors, nurses and other staff is a key to our success. Our services generate about 1.1 million patient visits to our clinics a year and $3.2 billion in annual revenue. We have 12,000 employees and dozens of locations throughout San Francisco as well as outreach clinics throughout Northern California and beyond.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,229
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-lawrence-health.jpeg
St. Lawrence Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucsfhealth.jpeg
UCSF Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Lawrence Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UCSF Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Lawrence Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UCSF Health in 2025.

Incident History — St. Lawrence Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Lawrence Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UCSF Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UCSF Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-lawrence-health.jpeg
St. Lawrence Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucsfhealth.jpeg
UCSF Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Motivation: Unknown
Blog: Blog

FAQ

St. Lawrence Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UCSF Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UCSF Health company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to St. Lawrence Health company.

In the current year, UCSF Health company and St. Lawrence Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Both UCSF Health company and St. Lawrence Health company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

UCSF Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while St. Lawrence Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UCSF Health company nor St. Lawrence Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St. Lawrence Health company nor UCSF Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UCSF Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

St. Lawrence Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UCSF Health company.

UCSF Health company employs more people globally than St. Lawrence Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UCSF Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UCSF Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UCSF Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UCSF Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UCSF Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UCSF Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N