Comparison Overview

St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

VS

Lifespan

St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

350 West Thomas Road, Phoenix, Arizona, US, 85013
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Located conveniently in the heart of Phoenix, Arizona, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center is a 450+ bed, not-for-profit hospital that provides a wide range of health, social and support services. We are extremely proud to be a nationally recognized center for quality tertiary care, medical education and research. St. Joseph’s includes the internationally renowned Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Heart & Lung Institute, the University of Arizona Cancer Center at St. Joseph’s, and St. Joseph’s Level I Trauma Center (which is verified by the American College of Surgeons). The hospital is also a respected center for high-risk obstetrics, neuro rehabilitation, orthopedics, and other medical services. U.S News & World Report routinely ranks St. Joseph's among the top hospitals in the U.S. for neurology and neurosurgery. In addition, St. Joseph’s boasts the Creighton School of Medicine at St. Joseph’s and a strategic alliance with Phoenix Children’s Hospital. Founded in 1895 by the Sisters of Mercy, St. Joseph’s was the first hospital in the Phoenix area. More than 117 years later, St. Joseph’s remains dedicated to its mission of caring for the poor and underserved. The hospital is part of Dignity Health, formerly Catholic Healthcare West. St. Joseph’s is consistently named an outstanding place to work and one of Arizona’s healthiest employers. Come grow your career with one of Arizona's Most Admired Companies.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 3,164
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Lifespan

167 Point Street, Providence, RI, US, 02903
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Formed in 1994, Brown University Health (Formerly Lifespan) is a not-for-profit health system based in Providence, RI comprising three teaching hospitals of The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University: Rhode Island Hospital and its Hasbro Children's; The Miriam Hospital; and Bradley Hospital, the nation’s first psychiatric hospital for children; Newport Hospital, Saint Anne's Hospital and Morton Hospital, community hospitals offering a broad range of health services; Gateway Healthcare, the state’s largest provider of community behavioral health care; and Brown Health Medical Group, the largest multi-specialty practice in Rhode Island. Brown University Health teaching hospitals are among the country’s top recipients of research funding from the US National Institutes of Health. The hospitals received $145 million in external research funding in fiscal 2023. All Brown University Health hospitals are charitable organizations that depend on support from the community to provide programs and services.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 23,394
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-josephs-hospital-and-medical-center.jpeg
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifespanhealthsystem.jpeg
Lifespan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lifespan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lifespan in 2025.

Incident History — St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lifespan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lifespan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-josephs-hospital-and-medical-center.jpeg
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Mislaid Hard Drives
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifespanhealthsystem.jpeg
Lifespan
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2022
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Encryption of data on servers
Blog: Blog

FAQ

St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lifespan company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center and Lifespan have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Lifespan company and St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Lifespan company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Lifespan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lifespan company nor St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center company nor Lifespan company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center nor Lifespan holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center company nor Lifespan company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lifespan company employs more people globally than St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center nor Lifespan holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center nor Lifespan holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center nor Lifespan holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center nor Lifespan holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center nor Lifespan holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center nor Lifespan holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H