Comparison Overview

St. Johns Law Group

VS

Center for Family Representation

St. Johns Law Group

104 Sea Grove Main Street, None, St. Augustine, FL, US, 32080
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

St. Augustine area’s largest law firm with over 10 attorneys, mediators and 250 years of combined experience. We match clients with attorneys who focus is on the area of law needed for their transaction or case. Whether a real estate transaction, construction law, a business agreement, estate planning (wills and trusts), family law (child support and alimony), probate or other legal issue, our attorneys are licensed professionals who are committed to providing client service with an eye to growing our reputation through customer service. We serve clients throughout the Northeast Florida Region, including Jacksonville, Ponte Vedra, Mandarin, Green Cove Springs, Palatka, and Palm Coast. We have worked extensively with businesses and real estate industry professionals that make an impact on St. Augustine and St. Johns County’s growth and development. Whether real estate transactions, land development, residential home building, commercial retailers, industrial centers, we have the experience that many major corporations have turned to for legal services. Real Estate, Civil Litigation, Construction Law, Family Law, Probate, Wills

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for Family Representation

40 Worth Street, New York, NY, 10013, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

CFR’s mission is to defend the rights of parents and youth through free, holistic interdisciplinary legal and social work representation. We fight for the integrity of families, primarily low-income Black and brown parents and youth targeted by systems of family regulation and incarceration. CFR’s model supports parents in raising their children with self-determination, reduces reliance on the foster system and youth incarceration, and addresses the underlying causes of family instability. We represent parents and youth in the Bronx, Manhattan and Queens; we provide training and technical assistance to more than 500 practitioners annually from around the country; and we work to promote systemic change that dignifies and benefits youth and families.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 152
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-johns-law-group.jpeg
St. Johns Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-family-representation.jpeg
Center for Family Representation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Johns Law Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Family Representation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Johns Law Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Family Representation in 2025.

Incident History — St. Johns Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Johns Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Family Representation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Family Representation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-johns-law-group.jpeg
St. Johns Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-family-representation.jpeg
Center for Family Representation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Family Representation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to St. Johns Law Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Family Representation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to St. Johns Law Group company.

In the current year, Center for Family Representation company and St. Johns Law Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Family Representation company nor St. Johns Law Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Family Representation company nor St. Johns Law Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Family Representation company nor St. Johns Law Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St. Johns Law Group company nor Center for Family Representation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Johns Law Group nor Center for Family Representation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither St. Johns Law Group company nor Center for Family Representation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for Family Representation company employs more people globally than St. Johns Law Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither St. Johns Law Group nor Center for Family Representation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Johns Law Group nor Center for Family Representation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Johns Law Group nor Center for Family Representation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Johns Law Group nor Center for Family Representation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Johns Law Group nor Center for Family Representation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Johns Law Group nor Center for Family Representation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X