Comparison Overview

St. Gregory Recovery Center

VS

SuperFriend

St. Gregory Recovery Center

601 2nd St, Bayard, Iowa, 50029, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

St. Gregory Recovery Center is a drug and alcohol treatment center for adults in Bayard, Iowa. At St. Gregory, we understand that recovery is a deeply personal experience. That's why we offer individualized care and a compassionate team to support you on your path. Start the journey today for yourself, your client, or a loved one at https://stgregoryctr.com/.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

SuperFriend

Melbourne, Victoria, undefined, undefined, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22

This is the official LinkedIn account for SuperFriend. Working with our customers, partners, providers and network, we’re helping people thrive at work. There is a recognised need to shift from raising awareness and reducing stigma to providing actionable insights that will shift the dial industry wide across mental health and wellbeing in the workplace. Through our research insights and advocacy work, SuperFriend are here to help make a positive difference in all types of workplaces across Australia. We exist to help people thrive at work, both today and tomorrow! Please note SuperFriend does not monitor this account 24/7 & we are unable to provide crisis support. Crisis support is available by calling Lifeline on 13 11 14.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-gregory-centers-inc.jpeg
St. Gregory Recovery Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/superfriend.jpeg
SuperFriend
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Gregory Recovery Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SuperFriend
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Gregory Recovery Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SuperFriend in 2026.

Incident History — St. Gregory Recovery Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Gregory Recovery Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SuperFriend (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SuperFriend cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-gregory-centers-inc.jpeg
St. Gregory Recovery Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to Email Accounts
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/superfriend.jpeg
SuperFriend
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

St. Gregory Recovery Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SuperFriend company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

St. Gregory Recovery Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SuperFriend company has not reported any.

In the current year, SuperFriend company and St. Gregory Recovery Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SuperFriend company nor St. Gregory Recovery Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

St. Gregory Recovery Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other SuperFriend company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SuperFriend company nor St. Gregory Recovery Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St. Gregory Recovery Center company nor SuperFriend company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Gregory Recovery Center nor SuperFriend holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

St. Gregory Recovery Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SuperFriend company.

St. Gregory Recovery Center company employs more people globally than SuperFriend company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither St. Gregory Recovery Center nor SuperFriend holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Gregory Recovery Center nor SuperFriend holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Gregory Recovery Center nor SuperFriend holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Gregory Recovery Center nor SuperFriend holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Gregory Recovery Center nor SuperFriend holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Gregory Recovery Center nor SuperFriend holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.