Comparison Overview

St. Charles Counseling

VS

LifeBridge Community Services, Inc.

St. Charles Counseling

311 N 2nd St, St Charles, 60174, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

St. Charles Counseling has been our serving our community and the Fox Valley area since 2005. We offer individual, marriage, and family counseling services. All our therapists at St. Charles Counseling have extensive experience working with individuals and couples. We are located in St. Charles, IL and serve clients from Geneva, Campton Hills, Batavia, West Chicago, South Elgin, and the surrounding areas.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LifeBridge Community Services, Inc.

475 Clinton Ave, Bridgeport, 06605, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

LifeBridge is committed to addressing the complex challenges faced by youth, adults, and families in the greater Bridgeport community in the realm of mental health and wellness. Our services, policies, and workplace culture are shaped through a trauma-informed lens, which ensures all are developed with the goal of helping our staff and clients feel physically and psychologically safe. We are a leading provider of mental health services and provide free trauma and cultural awareness training to the community free of charge. We believe quality behavioral healthcare should be accessible, person-centered, and holistic. No one is denied access to services due to inability to pay. There is a discounted/sliding fee schedule available. LifeBridge is one of eight Outpatient Urban Trauma Centers in CT.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 109
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-charles-counseling.jpeg
St. Charles Counseling
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifebridgect.jpeg
LifeBridge Community Services, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Charles Counseling
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LifeBridge Community Services, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Charles Counseling in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — St. Charles Counseling (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Charles Counseling cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-charles-counseling.jpeg
St. Charles Counseling
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifebridgect.jpeg
LifeBridge Community Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to St. Charles Counseling company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to St. Charles Counseling company.

In the current year, LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company and St. Charles Counseling company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company nor St. Charles Counseling company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company nor St. Charles Counseling company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company nor St. Charles Counseling company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St. Charles Counseling company nor LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Charles Counseling nor LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither St. Charles Counseling company nor LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company employs more people globally than St. Charles Counseling company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither St. Charles Counseling nor LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Charles Counseling nor LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Charles Counseling nor LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Charles Counseling nor LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Charles Counseling nor LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Charles Counseling nor LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H