Comparison Overview

St Albans Messenger

VS

Bonhill Group plc

St Albans Messenger

281 N Main St, St Albans, Vermont 05478-2503, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Currently owned by Jim O'Rourke, The Messenger has been an integral part of the community keeping readers educated and informed about local news and events. The Messenger has received numerous journalism awards in national, regional, and statewide competitions. To address greater commercial printing demands for small local businesses, the Messenger opened a print shop in the building – Messenger Marketing. Over the last thirty years, Messenger Marketing, previously Messenger Print & Design, has grown from a print shop to a full-service design studio handling traditional print jobs, while helping local businesses with branding and integrated marketing strategies executed via print, web and social media channels.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bonhill Group plc

29 Clerkenwell Road, London, undefined, EC1M 5RN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Bonhill Group plc is a leading, AIM-quoted, B2B global media company, delivering cutting-edge analysis, insight, networking and data for financial services and business solutions communities. We offer forward-thinking products and provide high-quality information that leads to better, and informed, decisions. Bonhill operates 11 core editorial websites, publishes 3 regular print titles and hosts 100+ events per annum, with flagship brands including InvestmentNews, Portfolio Adviser, What Investment and Small Business. Our formats span magazines, digital, events and data with our partner solutions offering advertising, event sponsorship, custom solutions and research. We are the trusted source of information for a range of audiences including fund selectors, technology leaders, D&I professionals and business owners.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-albans-messenger.jpeg
St Albans Messenger
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bonhillgroup.jpeg
Bonhill Group plc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St Albans Messenger
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bonhill Group plc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St Albans Messenger in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bonhill Group plc in 2025.

Incident History — St Albans Messenger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St Albans Messenger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bonhill Group plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bonhill Group plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-albans-messenger.jpeg
St Albans Messenger
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bonhillgroup.jpeg
Bonhill Group plc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

St Albans Messenger company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bonhill Group plc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bonhill Group plc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to St Albans Messenger company.

In the current year, Bonhill Group plc company and St Albans Messenger company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bonhill Group plc company nor St Albans Messenger company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bonhill Group plc company nor St Albans Messenger company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bonhill Group plc company nor St Albans Messenger company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St Albans Messenger company nor Bonhill Group plc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St Albans Messenger nor Bonhill Group plc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither St Albans Messenger company nor Bonhill Group plc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bonhill Group plc company employs more people globally than St Albans Messenger company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither St Albans Messenger nor Bonhill Group plc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St Albans Messenger nor Bonhill Group plc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St Albans Messenger nor Bonhill Group plc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St Albans Messenger nor Bonhill Group plc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St Albans Messenger nor Bonhill Group plc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St Albans Messenger nor Bonhill Group plc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.