Comparison Overview

St. Joseph Institute

VS

Alzheimer's Community Care

St. Joseph Institute

134 Jacobs Way, Port Matilda, 16870, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

St. Joseph Institute offers inpatient, residential drug & alcohol addiction treatment as well as residential care for people with primary mental health concerns. Located on a beautiful, remote campus in central PA, we provide one-on-one care for adults. Please visit our website to learn more about our program or call us to speak with an admissions counselor right away.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Alzheimer's Community Care

800 Northpoint Pkwy, None, West Palm Beach, Florida, US, 33407
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Alzheimer's Community Care is dedicated to promoting and providing community-based, family-centered care for patients and their caregivers living with neurocognitive disorders, through the belief, that where there is help, there is hope. Alzheimer's Community Care is a 501(c)(3) local nonprofit organization that has been providing care and resources to families in South Florida coping with Alzheimer's disease and related neurocognitive disorders for more than 20 years. Our specialized services include: - 11 Specialized Adult Day Care Centers, providing daily respite for both patients and caregivers; - Family Nurse Consultants, helping caregivers navigate the disease. Provided at no cost; - ID Locator Bracelets, allowing local law enforcement to quickly locate patients who wander away from home. Provided at no cost; - Case Managers, working with families to identify and access funding for services; - 24-Hour Crisis Line, connecting families in crisis to immediate assistance. Provided at no cost; - Education & Training, providing families, patients, caregivers, staff, law enforcement, students and other members of the community with the latest education on Alzheimer's disease and related neurocognitive disorders.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st--joseph-institute.jpeg
St. Joseph Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alzheimerscommunitycare.jpeg
Alzheimer's Community Care
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Joseph Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alzheimer's Community Care
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Joseph Institute in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alzheimer's Community Care in 2026.

Incident History — St. Joseph Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Joseph Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alzheimer's Community Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alzheimer's Community Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st--joseph-institute.jpeg
St. Joseph Institute
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to Email Accounts
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alzheimerscommunitycare.jpeg
Alzheimer's Community Care
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alzheimer's Community Care company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to St. Joseph Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

St. Joseph Institute company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Alzheimer's Community Care company has not reported any.

In the current year, Alzheimer's Community Care company and St. Joseph Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alzheimer's Community Care company nor St. Joseph Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

St. Joseph Institute company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Alzheimer's Community Care company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Alzheimer's Community Care company nor St. Joseph Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St. Joseph Institute company nor Alzheimer's Community Care company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Joseph Institute nor Alzheimer's Community Care holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

St. Joseph Institute company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Alzheimer's Community Care company.

Alzheimer's Community Care company employs more people globally than St. Joseph Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither St. Joseph Institute nor Alzheimer's Community Care holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Joseph Institute nor Alzheimer's Community Care holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Joseph Institute nor Alzheimer's Community Care holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Joseph Institute nor Alzheimer's Community Care holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Joseph Institute nor Alzheimer's Community Care holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Joseph Institute nor Alzheimer's Community Care holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N