Comparison Overview

SS&C Advent

VS

Swedbank

SS&C Advent

Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749

SS&C Advent, a business unit of SS&C Technologies, is helping over 4,300 investment firms in more than 50 countries—from established global institutions to small start-up practices—to grow their business and thrive. Delivering unparalleled precision and ahead-of-the-curve solutions for more than 30 years, we help firms minimize risk, work together seamlessly with our clients, and help shape the future of investment management. For more information on SS&C Advent products visit www.advent.com.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 1,716
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Swedbank

Landsvägen 40, SE-172 63, undefined, Sundbyberg, SE
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 800 and 849

Since 1820 Swedbank has been the bank for the many households and businesses. We are a modern financial services platform focused on customer satisfaction. Our goal is to encourage people to save for a better future and we aim to help people, businesses and society to grow by promoting a healthy and sustainable economy. As an equal opportunity employer we believe that diversity and equality help us to grow and achieve our goals. We encourage a culture built on trust, respect and our values - open, simple and caring. With 7.4 million private customers and more than 600,000 corporate and organisational customers we have a leading position in our home markets of Sweden, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. That position also enables us to offer our employees great opportunities to grow and develop. Working here is about creating value for our customers, our colleagues and society. Inspiring and learning from one another is what moves us forward and by working together we make a difference. Find our policy for social media here: www.swedbank.se/om-oss/policy-fb

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 14,977
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ssc-advent.jpeg
SS&C Advent
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swedbank.jpeg
Swedbank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SS&C Advent
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swedbank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SS&C Advent in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swedbank in 2025.

Incident History — SS&C Advent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SS&C Advent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Swedbank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swedbank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ssc-advent.jpeg
SS&C Advent
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2016
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swedbank.jpeg
Swedbank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Swedbank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SS&C Advent company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SS&C Advent company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Swedbank company has not reported any.

In the current year, Swedbank company and SS&C Advent company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Swedbank company nor SS&C Advent company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

SS&C Advent company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Swedbank company has not reported such incidents publicly.

SS&C Advent company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Swedbank company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SS&C Advent company nor Swedbank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SS&C Advent nor Swedbank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SS&C Advent company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Swedbank company.

Swedbank company employs more people globally than SS&C Advent company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither SS&C Advent nor Swedbank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SS&C Advent nor Swedbank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SS&C Advent nor Swedbank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SS&C Advent nor Swedbank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SS&C Advent nor Swedbank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SS&C Advent nor Swedbank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H