Comparison Overview

SS&C Technologies

VS

Epic

SS&C Technologies

80 Lamberton Road, Windsor, CT, 06095, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

SS&C is a leading global provider of mission-critical, cloud-based software and solutions for the financial and healthcare industries. Named to the Fortune 1000 list as a top U.S. company based on revenue, SS&C (NASDAQ: SSNC) is a trusted provider to more than 20,000 financial services and healthcare companies, with over 25,000 employees and operations in more than 40 countries. Built upon a foundation of expertise, innovation and excellent customer service, SS&C powers some of the largest financial and healthcare firms in the world.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 23,515
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Epic

1979 Milky Way, Verona, WI, 53593, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Join us in our mission to help the world get well, help the world stay well, and help future generations be healthier. We hire smart and motivated people from all academic majors to code, test, and implement healthcare software that hundreds of millions of patients and doctors rely on to improve care and ultimately save lives around the globe. No healthcare experience is necessary; we'll train you to be an expert in health IT and we'll provide you with personal development classes to grow as a professional. Our expectations for you are high, but in healthcare so are the stakes.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 15,615
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ss-c-technologies.jpeg
SS&C Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epic1979.jpeg
Epic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SS&C Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Epic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SS&C Technologies in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Epic in 2025.

Incident History — SS&C Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SS&C Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Epic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ss-c-technologies.jpeg
SS&C Technologies
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2016
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epic1979.jpeg
Epic
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2021
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Hacktivism
Blog: Blog

FAQ

SS&C Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Epic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SS&C Technologies company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Epic company.

In the current year, Epic company and SS&C Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Epic company nor SS&C Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

SS&C Technologies company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Epic company has not reported such incidents publicly.

SS&C Technologies company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Epic company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SS&C Technologies company nor Epic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SS&C Technologies nor Epic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SS&C Technologies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Epic company.

SS&C Technologies company employs more people globally than Epic company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither SS&C Technologies nor Epic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SS&C Technologies nor Epic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SS&C Technologies nor Epic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SS&C Technologies nor Epic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SS&C Technologies nor Epic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SS&C Technologies nor Epic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N