Comparison Overview

SPUR

VS

BIT

SPUR

654 Mission Street, San Francisco, California 94105, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

SPUR brings people together from across the political spectrum to develop solutions to the big problems cities face. With offices in San Francisco and San José, we are recognized as a leading civic planning organization and respected for our independent and holistic approach to urban issues. Through research, education and advocacy, SPUR works to create an equitable, sustainable and prosperous region in which all people thrive. SPUR is a member-supported nonprofit organization.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BIT

4 Matthew Parker Street, London, England, SW1H 9NH, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

BIT (the Behavioural Insights Team) is a global research and innovation consultancy which combines a deep understanding of human behaviour with evidence-led problem-solving to improve people’s lives. We work with all levels of government, nonprofits and the private sector, applying behavioural science expertise with robust evaluation and data to help clients achieve their goals. BIT has more than 200 staff, and operates from offices around the world. Together, our staff provide unrivalled behavioural science expertise, amassed through the delivery of more than 1,700 projects across hundreds of countries.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 264
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
SPUR
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/behavioural-insights-team.jpeg
BIT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SPUR
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BIT
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SPUR in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BIT in 2025.

Incident History — SPUR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SPUR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BIT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BIT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
SPUR
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/behavioural-insights-team.jpeg
BIT
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SPUR company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BIT company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BIT company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SPUR company.

In the current year, BIT company and SPUR company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BIT company nor SPUR company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BIT company nor SPUR company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BIT company nor SPUR company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SPUR company nor BIT company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SPUR nor BIT holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BIT company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SPUR company.

BIT company employs more people globally than SPUR company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither SPUR nor BIT holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SPUR nor BIT holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SPUR nor BIT holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SPUR nor BIT holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SPUR nor BIT holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SPUR nor BIT holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H