Comparison Overview

Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC

VS

Health Legal

Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC

701 S. Taylor, Amarillo, TX, 79101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

At Sprouse Shrader Smith, our mission is to provide excellent legal services with a team of professionals focused on exceeding client expectations through hard work, efficiency, and innovation, while maintaining our commitment to family and community. Large businesses, premier organizations and many individuals choose Sprouse Shrader Smith as their law firm because they appreciate the firm’s ethical reputation and wide-ranging experience. Attorneys and support staff alike provide each client with personalized, high-quality service. With attorneys practicing in Amarillo, Austin, Dalhart, and Victoria, Sprouse Shrader Smith is a full-service law firm, dedicated to serving key industries in those areas. Sprouse Shrader Smith’s clientele is as diverse as the practice areas that have built our firm’s foundation. From Agri-Business, Banking & Financial Services, Oil & Gas Law, Real Estate Law, Trial, Water Law, Wealth Planning Law, Probate and much more, we are here to help. You can also follow us at www.SprouseLaw.com.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Health Legal

46-48 Boundary St, South Melbourne, Victoria, AU, 3205
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Health Legal is a boutique, award winning law firm which focuses solely and uniquely on the needs of the Australian health, community service and aged care sectors. As a specialist firm, Health Legal’s team has extensive knowledge of the health, community service and aged care sector, meaning that we rarely encounter a question or contract that we have not previously considered. We provide more than just the right legal answer. We provide our clients with practical solutions which are relevant to the environment in which they operate. Since Health Legal’s establishment, we have assisted over 650 health, community service and aged care clients. Our client base includes public and private hospitals, diagnostic providers, community health centres, community service organisations, Primary Health Networks, statutory bodies, Government departments, research institutes, registered funded agencies, professional associations and health related entities and individuals. Over 200 organisations throughout Australia currently subscribe to our legislative compliance register and update services run through our business unit Law Compliance.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sprouse-shrader-smith-p-c-.jpeg
Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Health Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Health Legal in 2025.

Incident History — Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Health Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Health Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sprouse-shrader-smith-p-c-.jpeg
Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/health-legal-pty-ltd.jpeg
Health Legal
Incidents

FAQ

Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Health Legal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Health Legal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC company.

In the current year, Health Legal company and Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Health Legal company nor Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Health Legal company nor Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Health Legal company nor Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC company nor Health Legal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC nor Health Legal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC company nor Health Legal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC company employs more people globally than Health Legal company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC nor Health Legal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC nor Health Legal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC nor Health Legal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC nor Health Legal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC nor Health Legal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC nor Health Legal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X