Comparison Overview

Sprinting

VS

Westmark Labels & Marking

Sprinting

520 W. Willow St, Long Beach, Los Angeles, 90806, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Sprinting is a trend-setting print and binding firm based in Long Beach, California. Under one very large roof, we set, print and bind thousands of national and world-wide projects ranging from individual graphic promotions and business cards to catalogs, product packaging and hard-cover books. Sprinting was built on its founding partners’ combined work in the industry. As the business grew, we continued to pursue absolute perfection in printing. Today, Sprinting employs the leading technology available in the business. As a result, we consistently lead the pack in on-time and ahead-of-time production, cost efficiency and print accuracy. Sprinting offers its services online, and projects can be easily uploaded to our site and monitored through the print process. In addition, partners and staff of Sprinting work directly with each customer to satisfy their broad range of creative requirements. We look forward to serving you

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Westmark Labels & Marking

6701 SW McEwan Rd, Portland, Oregon, 97035, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Westmark Industries has been a leader in the labeling and marking business since 1982. We specialize in helping customers throughout the Northwest find solutions to their product identification needs. Headquartered in a 50,000 square foot facility near Portland in Lake Oswego, Oregon, we have seven branch locations serving customers as far away as Alaska and Hawaii. Our customers range from small companies to large corporations seeking labeling and marking expertise. We take great pride in applying current technologies to help our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sprinting.jpeg
Sprinting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/westmarklm.jpeg
Westmark Labels & Marking
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sprinting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Westmark Labels & Marking
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sprinting in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Westmark Labels & Marking in 2025.

Incident History — Sprinting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sprinting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Westmark Labels & Marking (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Westmark Labels & Marking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sprinting.jpeg
Sprinting
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/westmarklm.jpeg
Westmark Labels & Marking
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sprinting company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Westmark Labels & Marking company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Westmark Labels & Marking company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sprinting company.

In the current year, Westmark Labels & Marking company and Sprinting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking company nor Sprinting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking company nor Sprinting company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking company nor Sprinting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sprinting company nor Westmark Labels & Marking company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sprinting nor Westmark Labels & Marking holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sprinting company nor Westmark Labels & Marking company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Westmark Labels & Marking company employs more people globally than Sprinting company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Sprinting nor Westmark Labels & Marking holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sprinting nor Westmark Labels & Marking holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sprinting nor Westmark Labels & Marking holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sprinting nor Westmark Labels & Marking holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sprinting nor Westmark Labels & Marking holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sprinting nor Westmark Labels & Marking holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N