Comparison Overview

sPrint Textile Decorations

VS

Print Direction

sPrint Textile Decorations

75 Branduselor street, Baia Mare, 430066, RO
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sprint-romania.com/

sPrint Textile Decorations is active on the Romanian market since 2014 and is performing services with outstanding quality and unlimited added value, services for customers throughout Europe. The headquarters is situated in Baia Mare, in the Northern part of Romania, close to the Hungarian border, strategically placed to have a fast and easy access to Western Europe. Our DTP team, with more than 10 years experience in the graphics/printing industry, assures a fast and high reliable artwork service. With our own production facility – the very best technologies for silk screen, screen transfer, embroidery, direct to garment, digital transfer and other added value services like packaging, relabeling – and testing center we are able to apply decorations and prints on all kind of surfaces and products. Our methods of applied work are eco friendly. Maintaining the health of the environment is a priority to us. We are devoted to lower the impact of our printing activities by using a closed recycling circuit which is part of our production line and committed to following the necessary legislative requirements to do so.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Print Direction

1600 Indian Brook Way, Norcross, Georgia, 30093, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.printdirection.com

Print Direction is an end-to-end mobile technology company that designs, builds, and maintains marketing solutions including store profiling, print-on-demand immediacy, and real-time logistics reporting to ensure brand integrity and flexibility. Excelling in mobile engagement, the company currently supports thousands of owner/operator franchise locations across the U.S. Contact us today to get back to marketing!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sprint-textile-decorations.jpeg
sPrint Textile Decorations
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nimbleis.jpeg
Print Direction
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
sPrint Textile Decorations
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Print Direction
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for sPrint Textile Decorations in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Print Direction in 2025.

Incident History — sPrint Textile Decorations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

sPrint Textile Decorations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Print Direction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Print Direction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sprint-textile-decorations.jpeg
sPrint Textile Decorations
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nimbleis.jpeg
Print Direction
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both sPrint Textile Decorations company and Print Direction company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Print Direction company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to sPrint Textile Decorations company.

In the current year, Print Direction company and sPrint Textile Decorations company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Print Direction company nor sPrint Textile Decorations company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Print Direction company nor sPrint Textile Decorations company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Print Direction company nor sPrint Textile Decorations company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither sPrint Textile Decorations company nor Print Direction company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither sPrint Textile Decorations nor Print Direction holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither sPrint Textile Decorations company nor Print Direction company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Print Direction company employs more people globally than sPrint Textile Decorations company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither sPrint Textile Decorations nor Print Direction holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither sPrint Textile Decorations nor Print Direction holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither sPrint Textile Decorations nor Print Direction holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither sPrint Textile Decorations nor Print Direction holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither sPrint Textile Decorations nor Print Direction holds HIPAA certification.

Neither sPrint Textile Decorations nor Print Direction holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References