Comparison Overview

Springshare

VS

HF Group, LLC

Springshare

801 Brickell Ave, Miami, Florida, 33131, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Springshare is an internet software company focusing on developing engaging web applications for libraries and educational institutions. Springshare was founded in 2007 by Slaven Zivkovic, an ed-tech entrepreneur with a history of library innovations (and a history of working at libraries too - Slaven spent his undergraduate years as a library student assistant at his college library). Together with the select group of like-minded "Springys"​, the crew is creating cutting-edge library web apps and setting new standards for great customer service. Today, we're among the fastest growing library technology vendors, serving 4,800 Libraries in 78 countries. We're proud to serve libraries large and small - from many of the most prestigious universities worldwide to small community college campuses, public libraries of all sizes, special and government libraries, and many school and district libraries too. And the best part is, we're just getting started!

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HF Group, LLC

Corporate Headquarters, Chesterland, OH, 44026, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

With its roots in the library binding business, The HF Group has evolved into a recognized leader in the information industry, providing expert services in the care, delivery and preservation of information and cultural artifacts of many kinds. We operate six multi-functional strategically located production sites throughout the US. For over 75 years, The HF Group has remained dedicated to excellence and service to our clients. Clients include many of our nation's oldest and most prestigious research libraries, museums and archives. A key differentiator of The HF Group is our innovation through the application of new technologies. This allows us to achieve the highest level of quality while maintaining very competitive pricing. As a testament to this, here are three new technologies we now offer: Print on Demand (POD) and short run hard back and perfect binding solutions Thesis on Demand (TOD) an online service that is easy to use . . just a few clicks of the mouse for your thesis./dissertation printing and binding Kirtas'​ APT BookScan 1200(TM) automated bound document digitization systems which allows us to gently and consistently create high-resolution images from bound volumes. Some of our other specialties include: Prebinding, Library Binding, Digitization, Edition Print & Bind, Photo Books, Textbook Rebinding, Enclosures and Conservation.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springshare.jpeg
Springshare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-hf-group-llc.jpeg
HF Group, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Springshare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HF Group, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Springshare in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HF Group, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Springshare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Springshare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HF Group, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HF Group, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springshare.jpeg
Springshare
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-hf-group-llc.jpeg
HF Group, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

HF Group, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Springshare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, HF Group, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Springshare company.

In the current year, HF Group, LLC company and Springshare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HF Group, LLC company nor Springshare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither HF Group, LLC company nor Springshare company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HF Group, LLC company nor Springshare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Springshare company nor HF Group, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Springshare nor HF Group, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Springshare company nor HF Group, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

HF Group, LLC company employs more people globally than Springshare company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Springshare nor HF Group, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Springshare nor HF Group, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Springshare nor HF Group, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Springshare nor HF Group, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Springshare nor HF Group, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Springshare nor HF Group, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H