Comparison Overview

Springfield Museum of Art

VS

Liberty Science Center

Springfield Museum of Art

107 Cliff Park Rd, Springfield, Ohio, 45504, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20

The Springfield Museum of Art (SMoA) in Springfield, Ohio is a community-oriented art museum. It was incorporated in 1952 by a group of artists and citizens who felt a need for a visual arts facility in the community. The permanent collection, nearly 2,000 objects in all media, is primarily comprised of American art, with particular strength in works by artists with strong ties to Ohio and the Midwest, and special concentrations in art by women, self-taught artists, prints, and art created since the mid-19th centruy. The Museum is accredited by the American Alliance of Museums. SMoA is the only art museum in Ohio to bear the distinction as a Smithsonian Affiliate. It is also a participant in the national Arts Bridges partnership program as well as Museums for All. Mission: Springfield Museum of Art expands creativity and vitality by connecting art and communities.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Liberty Science Center

222 Jersey City Blvd., Jersey City, 07305, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Liberty Science Center is a nonprofit organization dedicated to getting learners of all ages excited about the power, promise, and pure fun of science and technology. We are located in Liberty State Park on the Jersey City bank of the Hudson near the Statue of Liberty. The Science Center houses 12 museum exhibition halls, a live animal collection with 110 species, giant aquariums, the Jennifer Chalsty Planetarium (the biggest planetarium in the Western Hemisphere), a 3D theater, live simulcast surgeries, tornado and hurricane-force wind simulators, K-12 classrooms and labs, and teacher-development programs. More than half a million students, teachers, and parents visit the Science Center each year, and tens of thousands more participate in the Center's offsite and online programs. As a leading cultural institution in the NYC metropolitan area we are always looking for bright individuals with a can-do attitude that turn the impossible into the possible.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 268
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springfield-museum-of-art-ohio.jpeg
Springfield Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/liberty-science-center.jpeg
Liberty Science Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Springfield Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Liberty Science Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Springfield Museum of Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Liberty Science Center in 2026.

Incident History — Springfield Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Springfield Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Liberty Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Liberty Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springfield-museum-of-art-ohio.jpeg
Springfield Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/liberty-science-center.jpeg
Liberty Science Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Liberty Science Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Springfield Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Liberty Science Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Springfield Museum of Art company.

In the current year, Liberty Science Center company and Springfield Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Liberty Science Center company nor Springfield Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Liberty Science Center company nor Springfield Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Liberty Science Center company nor Springfield Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Springfield Museum of Art company nor Liberty Science Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Springfield Museum of Art nor Liberty Science Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Springfield Museum of Art company nor Liberty Science Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Liberty Science Center company employs more people globally than Springfield Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Springfield Museum of Art nor Liberty Science Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Springfield Museum of Art nor Liberty Science Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Springfield Museum of Art nor Liberty Science Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Springfield Museum of Art nor Liberty Science Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Springfield Museum of Art nor Liberty Science Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Springfield Museum of Art nor Liberty Science Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H