Comparison Overview

Springfield Art Museum

VS

Paine Art Center and Gardens

Springfield Art Museum

1111 East Brookside Drive, Springfield, Missouri, 65807, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sgfmuseum.org/

OUR MISSION… The Springfield Art Museum is dedicated to enhancing the education and documenting the diverse cultural heritage of the people of southwest Missouri, through the collection, preservation and exhibition of art objects. OUR VISION… The Springfield Art Museum recognizes the past and embraces the future as a collaborator and catalyst for the transformation of individuals and the community through art. The Art Museum is a vital partner in the economic development of the city and values collaboration. The Museum will actively cultivate the use of its facilities both interior and exterior as a cultural resource for its citizens through the continued expansion of its permanent collection, creative development and expansion of exhibitions and providing educational outreach to the citizens of Southwest Missouri.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Paine Art Center and Gardens

1410 Algoma Blvd, Oshkosh, Wisconsin, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://thepaine.org

The Paine Art Center and Gardens is a historic estate flourishing with art, gardens and inspiration. The museum preserves the property’s historic architecture, with the mansion as the centerpiece, and many of the house’s interiors as they were created by founders Nathan and Jessie Kimberly Paine. Selections from the museum’s art collection, much of which was acquired by Nathan and Jessie, are featured in the many rooms and settings of the estate. Outdoors, the Paine maintains and enhances numerous display gardens as “galleries” of horticulture with varied designs and thousands of plant specimens. In addition, the museum presents changing art exhibitions, from classical to contemporary, as well as seasonal events like Nutcracker in the Castle during the holidays. The Paine hosts a wide range of programs throughout the year in the carriage house and conservatory.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springfield-art-museum.jpeg
Springfield Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paine-art-center-and-gardens.jpeg
Paine Art Center and Gardens
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Springfield Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Paine Art Center and Gardens
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Springfield Art Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paine Art Center and Gardens in 2026.

Incident History — Springfield Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Springfield Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Paine Art Center and Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paine Art Center and Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springfield-art-museum.jpeg
Springfield Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paine-art-center-and-gardens.jpeg
Paine Art Center and Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Paine Art Center and Gardens company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Springfield Art Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Paine Art Center and Gardens company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Springfield Art Museum company.

In the current year, Paine Art Center and Gardens company and Springfield Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Paine Art Center and Gardens company nor Springfield Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Paine Art Center and Gardens company nor Springfield Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Paine Art Center and Gardens company nor Springfield Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Springfield Art Museum company nor Paine Art Center and Gardens company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Springfield Art Museum nor Paine Art Center and Gardens holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Springfield Art Museum company nor Paine Art Center and Gardens company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Paine Art Center and Gardens company employs more people globally than Springfield Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Springfield Art Museum nor Paine Art Center and Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Springfield Art Museum nor Paine Art Center and Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Springfield Art Museum nor Paine Art Center and Gardens holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Springfield Art Museum nor Paine Art Center and Gardens holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Springfield Art Museum nor Paine Art Center and Gardens holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Springfield Art Museum nor Paine Art Center and Gardens holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References