Comparison Overview

Sports Trading Network

VS

International Gaming Standards Association

Sports Trading Network

W1J 9EF, London, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We are the largest and best connected network of sports trading professionals in the world. Our aim is to improve the profitability of sports traders through our knowledge, contacts and extensive global network. Whether you are a “sole trader” or bookmaker, we want to help you grow and evolve using our knowledge, contacts and network. Our network contains a wide range of companies, groups and individuals who provide services to sports traders or have relevant knowledge to share across the four main categories below: Data All traders use data; it is the cornerstone of all trading strategy. Data can be purchased, electronically scraped or gathered manually. However, it may be expensive to purchase, technically difficult to scrape and extremely costly and laborious to gather manually. Through our transparent network of contacts, Sports Trading Network can help semi-pro, pro and elite traders enhance their data sources and move to the next level of edge. Funding Size of bankroll can have a big impact on a trader’s ability to evolve their strategy. This area is applicable to semi-pro and pro traders who may struggle to fully capitalise their strategies. When initially starting out, or in the early stages of establishing a trading venture, low levels of funding can be fatal even with the finest and most advanced models. Sports Trading Network can help you find sponsors for your strategies to help ensure profitability and investment into people and technology. Liquidity Long term value from sports trading strategies can be directly related to the level of liquidity available for individual trades. Whichever sport you specialise in and whichever book, exchange or aggregation platform you use, are you certain that you can not gain access to deeper liquidity pools elsewhere? Prices Arguably pricing is the most important aspect of maximising profit; ensuring top price execution. Imbalance of global market pricing creates a wealth of opportunities for direct or statistical arbitrage. For value strategies, the ability to trade at the highest (or lowest) price is crucial and our global network can offer access to a wealth of mainstream and obscure sources of in-play and deadball prices. Investment proposals and article contributions always encouraged and welcomed; please forward interests to: [email protected]

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

International Gaming Standards Association

5177 Brandin Ct, Fremont, 94538, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Gaming Standards Association (GSA) is an international trade association that pioneers cutting edge and innovative solutions for the global gaming industry. Our mission is to facilitate the implementation of solutions that empower suppliers, operators and regulators with the highest level of excellence, performance and innovation through collaboration and education.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sports-trading-network.jpeg
Sports Trading Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gaming-standards-association.jpeg
International Gaming Standards Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sports Trading Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
International Gaming Standards Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sports Trading Network in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Gaming Standards Association in 2025.

Incident History — Sports Trading Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sports Trading Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — International Gaming Standards Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Gaming Standards Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sports-trading-network.jpeg
Sports Trading Network
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gaming-standards-association.jpeg
International Gaming Standards Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sports Trading Network company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to International Gaming Standards Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, International Gaming Standards Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sports Trading Network company.

In the current year, International Gaming Standards Association company and Sports Trading Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither International Gaming Standards Association company nor Sports Trading Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither International Gaming Standards Association company nor Sports Trading Network company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither International Gaming Standards Association company nor Sports Trading Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sports Trading Network company nor International Gaming Standards Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sports Trading Network nor International Gaming Standards Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sports Trading Network company nor International Gaming Standards Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

International Gaming Standards Association company employs more people globally than Sports Trading Network company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Sports Trading Network nor International Gaming Standards Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sports Trading Network nor International Gaming Standards Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sports Trading Network nor International Gaming Standards Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sports Trading Network nor International Gaming Standards Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sports Trading Network nor International Gaming Standards Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sports Trading Network nor International Gaming Standards Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H