Comparison Overview

Sport Line Egypt

VS

Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory

Sport Line Egypt

Maadi, Cairo, Egypt, Cairo, EG
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

Sport Line Company is a one of the leading companies in Egypt working in the field of Sporting goods since 1990. From beginners to athletes, sport has something for everyone. And it doesn't matter what you do, or how fast or slow you do it, the benefits of an active lifestyle are free for everyone to enjoy. At Sport line we are committed to giving our customers the best products by the best brands at the best price/quality ratio. We are the experts, always ready to help our customers select the shoes, apparel and equipment that best meet their individual needs. So whatever their age or ability, they can benefit from the rewards of regular exercise. We are specialized in : 1- Fitness Equipments & Accessories: in which we import directly from the best factories in Taiwan & China such as Motorized Treadmills, Bikes, Elliptical Bikes , Malty Gym, Weights , etc… As well as we distribute many fitness famous brands such as Kettler, Reebok, Body Solid Cybex, Technogym, Matrix, Horizon, etc…… 2- Sportswear & Footwear & Equipment: in which we deal with the most famous sports brand names such as Nike, Adidas, Reebok, Wilson, Head , Babolat Active, etc... 3- Exclusive Distributor: for the famous Australian surf wear Rip Curl in Egypt which is specialized in Beachwear , Footwear and Accessories …

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory

undefined, undefined, undefined, 28601, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Fleet Feet Sports-Hickory is dedicated to ensuring that runners, walkers and fitness enthusiasts of all abilities are FIT in the proper footwear, clothing, sports bras, accessories, and nutritional items for their individual needs. We are dedicated to making sure you find the items that best FIT your unique exercise activites and goals.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sport-line-egypt.jpeg
Sport Line Egypt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fleet-feet-sports--hickory.jpeg
Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sport Line Egypt
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sport Line Egypt in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory in 2025.

Incident History — Sport Line Egypt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sport Line Egypt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sport-line-egypt.jpeg
Sport Line Egypt
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fleet-feet-sports--hickory.jpeg
Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sport Line Egypt company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sport Line Egypt company.

In the current year, Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory company and Sport Line Egypt company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory company nor Sport Line Egypt company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory company nor Sport Line Egypt company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory company nor Sport Line Egypt company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sport Line Egypt company nor Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sport Line Egypt nor Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sport Line Egypt company nor Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sport Line Egypt company employs more people globally than Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Sport Line Egypt nor Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sport Line Egypt nor Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sport Line Egypt nor Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sport Line Egypt nor Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sport Line Egypt nor Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sport Line Egypt nor Fleet Feet Sports- Hickory holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H