Comparison Overview

Sport Dinaco Inc.

VS

Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC

Sport Dinaco Inc.

4330 Rue Joseph-Dubreuil, Montreal, Quebec, CA, H8T
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

In 1973, a young 23-year-old ski enthusiast named Larry Nardone founded his company, SPORT DINACO, in the basement of the family home. The small distribution office quickly became renowned for its quality products, personnel and outstanding personalized service. Close to 50 years later, the company has grown and the products have changed but the cornerstone of the company remains steadfast: PASSION FOR QUALITY. Innovative, high-end products, dedicated personnel and outstanding customer service continue to be the foundation on which thrives. Our Brands: -BLACK+BLUM -CHROME INDUSTRIES -LEKI -LOWA -ROHNER -SEIRUS -VAUDE

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC

Liverpool, 13088, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Based in Liverpool, NY., Cascade Maverik is comprised of two brands, Cascade and Maverik. Cascade’s “passion to protect” has helped it become the #1 manufacturer of lacrosse head protection for male and female athletes at all levels of the sport. Since 1986, Cascade prides itself on building and delivering high performance game-changing headgear, manufactured in the USA. Maverik, founded in 2005 by All-World professional lacrosse players, is a leading lacrosse manufacturer of heads, shafts, complete sticks, a complete line of protective gear, and accessories. Cascade Maverik LLC, along with sister brands Easton and Bauer, is part of Peak Achievement Athletics Inc. ("Peak"​ or the "Company"​) and its controlling shareholders, Sagard Holdings and Fairfax Financial (TSX:FFH)(TSX:FFH.U). For more information, please visit https://cascademaverik.com Join the conversation on Instagram – Men’s: @maveriklacrosse & @cascadelacrosse Women’s: @maverikwlx & @cascadewlx.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sport-dinaco-inc.jpeg
Sport Dinaco Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cascademaverik.jpeg
Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sport Dinaco Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sport Dinaco Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Sport Dinaco Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sport Dinaco Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sport-dinaco-inc.jpeg
Sport Dinaco Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cascademaverik.jpeg
Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Sport Dinaco Inc. company and Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sport Dinaco Inc. company.

In the current year, Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC company and Sport Dinaco Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC company nor Sport Dinaco Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC company nor Sport Dinaco Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC company nor Sport Dinaco Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. company nor Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sport Dinaco Inc. company.

Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC company employs more people globally than Sport Dinaco Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sport Dinaco Inc. nor Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H