Comparison Overview

Spiva Law Group

VS

LegalMatch

Spiva Law Group

48 W Montgomery Crossroads, Savannah, GA, US, 31406
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We are a group of personal injury lawyers specializing in personal injury claims, death claims, car wrecks, accidents, serious injuries, disability, injured workers, traumatic injury, brain injury, injuries on waterways, trucks or motorcycle collisions, slip and fall, back, spinal and brain injuries, closed head injuries, scarring, broken bones, chemical exposure, premise liability, dangerous products, railroad F.E.L.A. and related matters.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LegalMatch

300 E 2nd St, Reno, NV, 89501, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

LegalMatch was established in 1999 as a free, Web-based exchange to help individuals and small businesses make educated decisions when choosing a lawyer. Today, LegalMatch is the industry leader in legal marketing through our attorney/client matching services and is the best way to find the right lawyer. We are the premier marketing partner providing Legal Marketing Services for the solo and small firm attorney. Powered by leaders in engineering, law, membership services, marketing and administration, LegalMatch operates in all 50 states, and has developed a comprehensive team of legal marketing specialists that serve both consumers and the legal profession. The company is based in San Francisco, CA with offices in Austin, TX, Las Vegas, NV, and Reno, NV. "LegalMatch helps clients find the right attorney and attorneys effectively market their practice."​

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 332
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spiva-law-group.jpeg
Spiva Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legalmatch.jpeg
LegalMatch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Spiva Law Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LegalMatch
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spiva Law Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LegalMatch in 2025.

Incident History — Spiva Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spiva Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LegalMatch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LegalMatch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spiva-law-group.jpeg
Spiva Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legalmatch.jpeg
LegalMatch
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Spiva Law Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LegalMatch company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LegalMatch company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Spiva Law Group company.

In the current year, LegalMatch company and Spiva Law Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LegalMatch company nor Spiva Law Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LegalMatch company nor Spiva Law Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LegalMatch company nor Spiva Law Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Spiva Law Group company nor LegalMatch company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Spiva Law Group nor LegalMatch holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

LegalMatch company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Spiva Law Group company.

LegalMatch company employs more people globally than Spiva Law Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Spiva Law Group nor LegalMatch holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Spiva Law Group nor LegalMatch holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Spiva Law Group nor LegalMatch holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Spiva Law Group nor LegalMatch holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Spiva Law Group nor LegalMatch holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Spiva Law Group nor LegalMatch holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X