Comparison Overview

Spiritual Thinking

VS

Jones Publishing Inc.

Spiritual Thinking

Seoul Street 7/1, 5th khoroolol, 2nd Khoroo, Sukhbaatar District, Ulaanbaatar, 14251, MN
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.spiritual-thinking.com

The secrets behind positive thinking in the realm of the spiritual world. Gain practical knowledge about the invisible force and apply it to your life based on Mongolian traditional shamanic ideology. Obtaining these core essences of the spiritual world for success can also help you live in harmony and meaningfulness with Mother Nature.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Jones Publishing Inc.

N7528 Aanstad Rd, Iola, WI, 54945, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jonespublishing.com

Jones Publishing publishes nine company-owned magazine titles, two custom publications, serves three member organizations, hosts multiple websites, discussion boards, and produces several newsletters. In addition, Jones Publishing offers several custom publishing options for companies who want to expand their marketing efforts and increase their influence with customers. The daily mission at Jones Publishing is to deliver the most vital information for each community of readers in order to promote the growth of the companies who serve those communities. Each member of the JP team adds a unique contribution to the mission and is continually striving to give you nothing less than the highest quality in publishing.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spiritual-thinking.jpeg
Spiritual Thinking
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jones-publishing-inc..jpeg
Jones Publishing Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Spiritual Thinking
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jones Publishing Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spiritual Thinking in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jones Publishing Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Spiritual Thinking (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spiritual Thinking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jones Publishing Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jones Publishing Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spiritual-thinking.jpeg
Spiritual Thinking
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jones-publishing-inc..jpeg
Jones Publishing Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Spiritual Thinking company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jones Publishing Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jones Publishing Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Spiritual Thinking company.

In the current year, Jones Publishing Inc. company and Spiritual Thinking company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jones Publishing Inc. company nor Spiritual Thinking company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jones Publishing Inc. company nor Spiritual Thinking company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jones Publishing Inc. company nor Spiritual Thinking company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Spiritual Thinking company nor Jones Publishing Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Spiritual Thinking nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Spiritual Thinking company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jones Publishing Inc. company.

Neither Spiritual Thinking nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Spiritual Thinking nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Spiritual Thinking nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Spiritual Thinking nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Spiritual Thinking nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Spiritual Thinking nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References