Comparison Overview

Spin UK Limited

VS

Jacksons Australia

Spin UK Limited

Oak House, Worcester, Worcestershire, WR2 5HP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1999, Spin UK Ltd was the second company in the Spin Group. Initially focusing on providing Production Engine Hot Test facilities for Automotive and Industrial Engine Manufacturers in the UK and Europe. Our close relationships and engineering prowess has driven us to expand our portfolio to include bespoke component test benches and facilities, Data Acquisition and Logging, Plant Condition Monitoring, Mechanical and Electrical design and manufacture. Safety is always at the forefront of any equipment we design and supply. We have received recognition of this with a Global Safety Award from Ford Motor Company for our operator free Engine Hot test facilities that we supplied and installed at their Bridgend and South African Engine Manufacturing Centres.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jacksons Australia

185 Thomas St, Murray Bridge, South Australia, 5253, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-24

We manufacture quality products, 100% Australian made and owned. Jackson’s specialise in consultation, design and manufacture of Agricultural products including Animal Housing, Feed Systems, Silos and Structural Fabrication. We pride ourselves in designing innovative new concepts to ensure our products are not only premium quality but also tailored specifically to suit individual needs. The need and desire to diversify and grow has seen us expand into various fields including, structural engineering, industrial sheds / warehouses, Automotive aftermarket & 4x4 industries with "Carry Me Campers"​, Aluminium Fabrication of Canopies, Trays & Toolboxes. Jackson’s have a strong customer base supplying products throughout Australia. We measure our performance by the increasing number of satisfied, repeat customers. The founding partners at Jackson’s have a strong Engineering and agricultural background, we take pride in our products and quality continues to be one of our major marketing advantages.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spin-uk.jpeg
Spin UK Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jacksons-australia.jpeg
Jacksons Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Spin UK Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jacksons Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spin UK Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jacksons Australia in 2025.

Incident History — Spin UK Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spin UK Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jacksons Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jacksons Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spin-uk.jpeg
Spin UK Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jacksons-australia.jpeg
Jacksons Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Spin UK Limited company and Jacksons Australia company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Jacksons Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Spin UK Limited company.

In the current year, Jacksons Australia company and Spin UK Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jacksons Australia company nor Spin UK Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jacksons Australia company nor Spin UK Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jacksons Australia company nor Spin UK Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Spin UK Limited company nor Jacksons Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Spin UK Limited nor Jacksons Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Spin UK Limited company nor Jacksons Australia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Spin UK Limited company employs more people globally than Jacksons Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Spin UK Limited nor Jacksons Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Spin UK Limited nor Jacksons Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Spin UK Limited nor Jacksons Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Spin UK Limited nor Jacksons Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Spin UK Limited nor Jacksons Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Spin UK Limited nor Jacksons Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H