Comparison Overview

Spin Inc

VS

Tipstrr

Spin Inc

35 SW 12th Street, Suite 107 Dania, Florida 33004, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1992, Spin Inc. takes pride in providing top quality used gaming equipment to the Caribbean, Central and South American market places. Our newly constructed facility is state-of-the-art. It offers secure storage for all types of gaming machines and equipment and is conveniently located. All shipments can be delivered directly to Miami International Airport or containerized out of Miami or Fort Lauderdale sea ports. Because of our volume and relationships with our freight carriers, we can provide competitive freight rates for quality shipping services. We welcome your inquiries, our international division will be glad to help you with your casino needs.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tipstrr

3.10 Avenue HQ, Leeds, England, LS1 2BH, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Tipstrr is at the forefront of the sports betting advice industry. We allow sports bettors and sports experts to prove they know what they're talking about Our technology manages the entire process automatically, allowing our experts to focus on the most important aspect of what they do - making a profit for them and their followers. Transparent leaderboards allow visitors to decide for themselves the type of Tipstrr they'd want to follow. We offer markets on 16 sports, including Horse Racing, Football, Basketball, Baseball, American Football, Ice Hockey and even eSports. Our service is the most comprehensive and easy to use (oh, and it's free)

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spin-inc.jpeg
Spin Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tipstrr-ltd.jpeg
Tipstrr
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Spin Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tipstrr
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spin Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tipstrr in 2025.

Incident History — Spin Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spin Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tipstrr (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tipstrr cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spin-inc.jpeg
Spin Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tipstrr-ltd.jpeg
Tipstrr
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tipstrr company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Spin Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tipstrr company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Spin Inc company.

In the current year, Tipstrr company and Spin Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tipstrr company nor Spin Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tipstrr company nor Spin Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tipstrr company nor Spin Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Spin Inc company nor Tipstrr company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Spin Inc nor Tipstrr holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Spin Inc company nor Tipstrr company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tipstrr company employs more people globally than Spin Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Spin Inc nor Tipstrr holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Spin Inc nor Tipstrr holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Spin Inc nor Tipstrr holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Spin Inc nor Tipstrr holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Spin Inc nor Tipstrr holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Spin Inc nor Tipstrr holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H