Comparison Overview

SPIEGEL Media

VS

Nathan

SPIEGEL Media

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://gruppe.spiegel.de/spiegel-media/

Die publizistische Qualität bildet stets den Markenkern aller von SPIEGEL Media vermarkteten Medien. Dieser Anspruch sichert unseren Medien die beständige Loyalität ihrer Nutzer:innen und ist damit der Schlüssel für den nachhaltigen Erfolg unserer Arbeit und der unserer Partner. Mit ihrer Vermarktungseinheit SPIEGEL Media ist die SPIEGEL-Gruppe Teil der iq media und iq digital für das klassische Media-Geschäft und beheimatet parallel eine eigene Vermarktungsabteilung. Als starker Partner bieten die iq media und iq digital in Deutschland einzigartige Reichweite gepaart mit einem umfangreichen Portfolio aus herausragenden Medienmarken, zu denen auch die Marken der SPIEGEL-Gruppe zählen. Wir bei SPIEGEL Media fokussieren uns auf spezifische Kernkompetenzen.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Nathan

92, Avenue de France, Paris, 75013, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nathan.fr

Apprendre, lire, jouer. Maison d'édition fondée par Fernand Nathan en 1881 Acteur majeur de l'édition scolaire et parascolaire et de l'édition jeunesse. Présente sur l'ensemble des marchés scolaires: de la maternelle, de l'élémentaire, du collège, du lycée, de l'enseignement technique et professionnel Présente sur les marchés de la petite enfance, des jeux éducatifs et de l'édition jeunesse Présente sur les marchés de l'enseignement supérieur et de la formation Approche multi-supports depuis l'origine: matériel éducatif et pédagogique, ouvrages imprimés, ebooks et outils numériques et multimédia, jeux sérieux.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 697
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spiegelmedia.jpeg
SPIEGEL Media
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nathan.jpeg
Nathan
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SPIEGEL Media
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nathan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SPIEGEL Media in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nathan in 2025.

Incident History — SPIEGEL Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SPIEGEL Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nathan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nathan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spiegelmedia.jpeg
SPIEGEL Media
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nathan.jpeg
Nathan
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nathan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SPIEGEL Media company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nathan company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SPIEGEL Media company.

In the current year, Nathan company and SPIEGEL Media company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nathan company nor SPIEGEL Media company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nathan company nor SPIEGEL Media company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nathan company nor SPIEGEL Media company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SPIEGEL Media company nor Nathan company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SPIEGEL Media nor Nathan holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SPIEGEL Media company nor Nathan company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither SPIEGEL Media nor Nathan holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SPIEGEL Media nor Nathan holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SPIEGEL Media nor Nathan holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SPIEGEL Media nor Nathan holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SPIEGEL Media nor Nathan holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SPIEGEL Media nor Nathan holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References