Comparison Overview

Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC

VS

Romore Associates

Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC

150 N. Radnor Chester Road, Radnor, PA 19087, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Located in Radnor, PA, Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC (www.spidernetconsulting.com) is a leader in small business technology consulting services. Spidernet focuses primarily on the planning, implementation, and management of Microsoft server and desktop technologies. We are an exciting and innovative company with a diversified portfolio of clients in the professional services, manufacturing, commercial contracting, and nonprofit business sectors.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Romore Associates

Liberty Street, Manchester, NH, 03104, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Through excellent customer service, state-of-the-art technology, creative vantage points and our strategic alliances, our goal is to help you meet your goals! Please explore and enjoy our site, check out our Products and Services page for more information on what we provide, view some of the client sites that we have produced.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spidernet-technical-consulting-llc.jpeg
Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/romore-associates.jpeg
Romore Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Romore Associates
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Romore Associates in 2025.

Incident History — Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Romore Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Romore Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spidernet-technical-consulting-llc.jpeg
Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/romore-associates.jpeg
Romore Associates
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Romore Associates company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Romore Associates company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company.

In the current year, Romore Associates company and Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Romore Associates company nor Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Romore Associates company nor Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Romore Associates company nor Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company nor Romore Associates company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC nor Romore Associates holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company nor Romore Associates company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company employs more people globally than Romore Associates company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC nor Romore Associates holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC nor Romore Associates holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC nor Romore Associates holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC nor Romore Associates holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC nor Romore Associates holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC nor Romore Associates holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.