Comparison Overview

Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC

VS

Charleston Legal Access

Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC

414 Union Street, Nashville, TN, 37219, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC (SR) is a mid-size law firm serving clients with legal and business needs. With its origin in Memphis, Tennessee in 1963, SR now has offices in Nashville, Memphis, Chattanooga, Knoxville, and Little Rock, AR. SR represents clients in every county in Tennessee, Arkansas, as well as northern Mississippi, north Georgia and southern Kentucky. Clients include local, regional and national companies and individuals. SR has represented many of its clients for decades, some for more than 40 years. SR prides itself on service to its clients and knowing its clients'​ businesses. SR is an AV-rated law firm - the highest rating possible. SR is committed to giving quality legal representation at reasonable cost. When clients need advice in other jurisdictions, Spicer Rudstrom is able to rely upon relationships it has with law firms across the United States and with more than 3,000 attorneys in 130 cities, in more than 40 countries around the world. Most importantly, SR's objective is to protect its client's brand. Apart from its core as a law firm, SR encourages its attorneys to give back. SR attorneys do so by charitable giving, participation in charitable and community organizations and membership on committees and boards. Content is for informational purposes only and does not contain legal or other advice and/or opinions. Additional information available at www.spicerfirm.com.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Charleston Legal Access

1816 Success St, Building A, Unit 102, North Charleston, South Carolina, US, 29405
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Charleston Legal Access (CLA) is a nonprofit law firm dedicated to expanding access to legal services and rights in South Carolina. CLA serves moderate- and low-income individuals, providing legal representation at reduced fees calculated on a sliding scale and engages in projects to expand access to justice in South Carolina.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spicer-rudstrom-pllc.jpeg
Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Charleston Legal Access
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charleston Legal Access in 2025.

Incident History — Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Charleston Legal Access (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charleston Legal Access cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spicer-rudstrom-pllc.jpeg
Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charleston-legal-access.jpeg
Charleston Legal Access
Incidents

FAQ

Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charleston Legal Access company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Charleston Legal Access company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC company.

In the current year, Charleston Legal Access company and Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Charleston Legal Access company nor Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Charleston Legal Access company nor Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Charleston Legal Access company nor Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC company nor Charleston Legal Access company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC nor Charleston Legal Access holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC company nor Charleston Legal Access company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC company employs more people globally than Charleston Legal Access company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC nor Charleston Legal Access holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC nor Charleston Legal Access holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC nor Charleston Legal Access holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC nor Charleston Legal Access holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC nor Charleston Legal Access holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC nor Charleston Legal Access holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X