Comparison Overview

SPG Studios

VS

Filmerama

SPG Studios

919 N Victory Blvd, Burbank, California, 91502, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

SPG provides foreign-language dubbing services to prominent TV, film, video game, and advertising clients. We built our reputation by providing extremely high-quality service to very prominent (and demanding) customers. As a result, the foundation of our culture is flexibility and problem-solving. We don’t know how to spell burokracy. But we do understand deadlines and delivering under pressure. We have ambitions to grow and are excited for the challenges that lie ahead.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Filmerama

Rua Pedro Borges 75, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60055-110, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Fundada em janeiro 2013, a Filmerama é classificada como “Produtora Brasileira Independente” nos termos da ANCINE – Agência Nacional do Cinema, portanto suas obras são passíveis de reconhecimento como “Obra não publicitária brasileira, Constituinte de espaço qualificado e Independente”, satisfazendo assim o cumprimento de cotas de conteúdo de qualidade para a TV paga em horário nobre. Uma empresa jovem que atua na criação e produção de conteúdo nos segmentos de cinema, TV e web. A Filmerama é um escritório criativo que se dedica a criação de conteúdo para os diversos segmentos de mercado audiovisual e produz em parceria com outras produtoras filmes e séries em diversos gêneros como drama, horror, suspense, comédia, documentários e animação.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spgstudios.jpeg
SPG Studios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/filmerama.jpeg
Filmerama
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SPG Studios
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Filmerama
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SPG Studios in 2025.

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Filmerama in 2025.

Incident History — SPG Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SPG Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Filmerama (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Filmerama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spgstudios.jpeg
SPG Studios
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/filmerama.jpeg
Filmerama
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both SPG Studios company and Filmerama company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Filmerama company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SPG Studios company.

In the current year, Filmerama company and SPG Studios company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Filmerama company nor SPG Studios company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Filmerama company nor SPG Studios company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Filmerama company nor SPG Studios company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SPG Studios company nor Filmerama company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SPG Studios nor Filmerama holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SPG Studios company nor Filmerama company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SPG Studios company employs more people globally than Filmerama company, reflecting its scale as a Movies, Videos, and Sound.

Neither SPG Studios nor Filmerama holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SPG Studios nor Filmerama holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SPG Studios nor Filmerama holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SPG Studios nor Filmerama holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SPG Studios nor Filmerama holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SPG Studios nor Filmerama holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N