Comparison Overview

S&P Global

VS

Charles Schwab

S&P Global

55 Water Street, New York, NY, 10041, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.spglobal.com

S&P Global provides governments, businesses, and individuals with market data, expertise, and technology solutions for confident decision-making. Our services span from global energy solutions to sustainable finance solutions. From helping our customers perform investment analysis to guiding them through sustainability and energy transition across supply chains, our solutions help unlock new opportunities and solve challenges. We are widely sought after by many of the world’s leading organizations to provide credit ratings, competitive benchmarking and data driven analytics in global capital markets, commodity, and automotive markets. Our divisions include S&P Global Market Intelligence, S&P Global Ratings, S&P Global Commodity Insights, S&P Global Mobility, S&P Dow Jones Indices, and the renowned S&P 500 index. Additionally, our S&P Global Sustainable1 brings sustainability benchmarking, analytics, and evaluations together, to help customers achieve their sustainability goals. See the latest research & insights at www.spglobal.com

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 42,945
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Charles Schwab

3000 Schwab Way, Westlake, Texas, US, 76262
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aboutschwab.com

Charles Schwab is a different kind of investment services firm – one that strives to disrupt the status quo of the traditional Wall Street approach on behalf of our clients. We believe today, as we did on Day 1, that when you find ways to improve the investing experience for your clients, then business results will follow. Follow our company culture at #SchwabLife and see how we give back at #Schwab4Good. Support hours: 7 a.m.–7 p.m. CT or 24/7 at schwab.com/contact-us. Social Media Disclosures: https://www.aboutschwab.com/social-media (#0424-TM8W)

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 33,248
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spglobal.jpeg
S&P Global
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charles-schwab.jpeg
Charles Schwab
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
S&P Global
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Charles Schwab
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for S&P Global in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

Charles Schwab has 20.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — S&P Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

S&P Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Charles Schwab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charles Schwab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spglobal.jpeg
S&P Global
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charles-schwab.jpeg
Charles Schwab
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: SMS Phishing (Smishing), Mobile Phishing Kits (Telegram-distributed), Spoofed Brokerage Alerts (iMessage/RCS), One-Time Passcode (OTP) Interception, Compromised Mobile Wallets (Apple/Google Pay), Coordinated Trading via Hijacked Accounts
Motivation: Financial Gain (Stock Price Manipulation), Fraudulent E-Commerce/Tap-to-Pay Transactions, Sale of Compromised Accounts/Devices on Dark Web, Exploitation of Cross-Border Regulatory Gaps
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Wrongdoing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

S&P Global company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charles Schwab company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Charles Schwab company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas S&P Global company has not reported any.

In the current year, Charles Schwab company has reported more cyber incidents than S&P Global company.

Neither Charles Schwab company nor S&P Global company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Charles Schwab company has disclosed at least one data breach, while S&P Global company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Charles Schwab company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while S&P Global company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither S&P Global company nor Charles Schwab company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither S&P Global nor Charles Schwab holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

S&P Global company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Charles Schwab company.

S&P Global company employs more people globally than Charles Schwab company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither S&P Global nor Charles Schwab holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither S&P Global nor Charles Schwab holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither S&P Global nor Charles Schwab holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither S&P Global nor Charles Schwab holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither S&P Global nor Charles Schwab holds HIPAA certification.

Neither S&P Global nor Charles Schwab holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References