Comparison Overview

SpeedPro Chicago Loop

VS

Chase Print Group

SpeedPro Chicago Loop

40 East Delaware Place, Chicago, IL, 60611, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.speedprochicagoloop.com

We are a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business and have been awarded '3-Best Sign Shops in Chicago' for 4 years running! Our team specializes in producing an impressive variety of high-end digital imaging solutions, including: -Event graphics -Interior Design Graphics -Trade Show Displays -Wall Graphics -Retail Graphics and Signage -Real Estate Signage -Glass Etching -MORE! Highly regarded as industry experts, we're commonly writing for or featured in national trade magazines due to our unique ability to create ‘Surface Impact’®; the 360’ holistic approach is more akin to a marketing solutions agency than a typical printer as we focus on how to best leverage a space for maximum ROI and greatest visual impression. Boasting a class-A client roster and punching well above our weight, we've partnered with renowned brands to include Nike, PUMA, Smile Direct Club, House of Blues, American Marketing Association, Samuel Adams, Special Olympics, Fresh Blends, Pleasure Chest and literally hundreds more! Give us a call and let's see if we can help you with your upcoming printing and signage needs!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Chase Print Group

12 Campbell St, Yarraville, Victoria, 3013, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.chaseprint.com.au

Family owned and run printing company. Proudly manufacturing in Melbourne. Specialising digital printing, offset printing, large format & graphic design. If you are looking for a team that will work with you, who are ready for a challenge and are energised by the satisfaction of another happy client, Chase Print Group is who you are looking for. Give us a go and an opportunity to impress you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/speedpro-chicago-loop.jpeg
SpeedPro Chicago Loop
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chaseprint.jpeg
Chase Print Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SpeedPro Chicago Loop
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chase Print Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SpeedPro Chicago Loop in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chase Print Group in 2025.

Incident History — SpeedPro Chicago Loop (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SpeedPro Chicago Loop cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chase Print Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chase Print Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/speedpro-chicago-loop.jpeg
SpeedPro Chicago Loop
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chaseprint.jpeg
Chase Print Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Chase Print Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SpeedPro Chicago Loop company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chase Print Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SpeedPro Chicago Loop company.

In the current year, Chase Print Group company and SpeedPro Chicago Loop company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chase Print Group company nor SpeedPro Chicago Loop company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chase Print Group company nor SpeedPro Chicago Loop company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chase Print Group company nor SpeedPro Chicago Loop company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SpeedPro Chicago Loop company nor Chase Print Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SpeedPro Chicago Loop nor Chase Print Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SpeedPro Chicago Loop company nor Chase Print Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SpeedPro Chicago Loop company employs more people globally than Chase Print Group company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither SpeedPro Chicago Loop nor Chase Print Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SpeedPro Chicago Loop nor Chase Print Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SpeedPro Chicago Loop nor Chase Print Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SpeedPro Chicago Loop nor Chase Print Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SpeedPro Chicago Loop nor Chase Print Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SpeedPro Chicago Loop nor Chase Print Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References