Comparison Overview

Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark

VS

Edale Ltd

Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark

601 Dover Road, Rockville, MD, 20850, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Spectrum Printing & Graphics is a full service commercial printing organization that provides a unique combination of fully integrated communication solutions. Spectrum offers offset and digital printing, project management, graphic design, digital prepress, signage, promotional products, mailing and fulfillment. We strive to provide the right balance of personal attention, technical integration and know-how. Our detailed approach to the entire production and distribution process of printed materials has enabled our clients to realize their objectives, and to meet their deadlines in a cost-effective and timely manner. Please contact us and let us show you how we can help you and your organization achieve your goals and to communicate more effectively and cost efficiently with your desired audience.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Edale Ltd

Units 1, 2 & 3 Lavenham Business Park, Whiteley, undefined, PO15 7FY, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

ABOUT EDALE: Edale – the carton and label press people. Edale designs and engineers printing and converting solutions that are trusted globally by business owners, packaging specialists and production managers from organisations of every size. With a rich heritage in the packaging industry spanning over 75 years, Edale, a Canon Company, has been a trusted name since its first drawing was registered in 1946. Leveraging its deep-rooted engineering expertise as part of the Canon family, Edale manufactures world-class equipment and provides solutions that consistently enable its customers to produce high-quality cartons and labels. Edale exports 80% of its products, and its activities are focused on four key business sectors: Cartons, Labels Digital and Service & Support, giving customers ultimate confidence in productivity, quality, efficiency and agility. Together with leading partners, and a worldwide distribution network, Edale designs its technologies to be fully upgradeable and adaptable, keeping customers on the front foot no matter how the market evolves. Supported by its world-class team, Edale operates from a facility on the Coast of the UK, showcasing its commitment to innovation and engineering excellence in the packaging industry. To find out more about how Edale could increase your efficiency and quality, please get in touch!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spectrum-printing-&-graphics.jpeg
Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edale-ltd.jpeg
Edale Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Edale Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edale Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Edale Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edale Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spectrum-printing-&-graphics.jpeg
Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edale-ltd.jpeg
Edale Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Edale Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Edale Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company.

In the current year, Edale Ltd company and Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Edale Ltd company nor Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Edale Ltd company nor Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Edale Ltd company nor Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company nor Edale Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark nor Edale Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company nor Edale Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Edale Ltd company employs more people globally than Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark nor Edale Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark nor Edale Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark nor Edale Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark nor Edale Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark nor Edale Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark nor Edale Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L