Comparison Overview

Specsavers

VS

Big Lots

Specsavers

La Villiaize, St Andrews, Global, GB, GY6 8YP
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

Specsavers began 40 years ago with the vision of two optometrists, Doug and Mary Perkins, who set out to provide best-value eyecare to everybody. Their passion for optometry has led Specsavers to become the largest privately-owned optical group in the world, delivering high-quality, affordable optical and hearing care in 12 countries. And it continues to shape the lives and experience of around 41,000 colleagues who are developing their careers with us across the globe.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 27,385
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Big Lots

4900 E Dublin Granville Rd, Columbus, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Big Lots is an off-price retailer, offering bargains on everything for the home, including furniture, décor, pantry essentials, kitchenware, pet supplies, and more. Big Lots fulfills its mission to help customers "Live Big and Save Lots" by strategically sourcing bargains in a variety of creative ways, such as closeouts, overstocks and manufacturer liquidations.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 17,565
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/specsavers.jpeg
Specsavers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-lots.jpeg
Big Lots
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Specsavers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Big Lots
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Specsavers in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Big Lots in 2026.

Incident History — Specsavers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Specsavers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Big Lots (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Big Lots cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/specsavers.jpeg
Specsavers
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-lots.jpeg
Big Lots
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Specsavers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Big Lots company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Specsavers company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Big Lots company has not reported any.

In the current year, Big Lots company and Specsavers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Big Lots company nor Specsavers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Big Lots company nor Specsavers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Big Lots company nor Specsavers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Specsavers company nor Big Lots company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Specsavers nor Big Lots holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Specsavers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Big Lots company.

Specsavers company employs more people globally than Big Lots company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Specsavers nor Big Lots holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Specsavers nor Big Lots holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Specsavers nor Big Lots holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Specsavers nor Big Lots holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Specsavers nor Big Lots holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Specsavers nor Big Lots holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.