Comparison Overview

Special T Unlimited

VS

Jones Printing Service, Inc.

Special T Unlimited

4835 West Butterfield Road, Hillside, Illinois, 60162, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18

As with any success story there is a humble beginning. For Special T Unlimited, it begins in 1975 where owner Lou Baldo began printing t-shirts out of his garage in Broadview, IL. The business grew and Lou moved his operation to a shop consisting of 400 square feet. Within three short years the concept had grown so tremendously that once again Special T Unlimited had outgrown its walls. Today the business is housed in a half block facility located in the heart of the community of Hillside, IL. Now, 45 years later, Special T Unlimited has exceeded the screen printing and embroidery needs of thousands of local businesses, corporations, non-profit organizations and countless other clients. Special T Unlimited stands apart by offering their clients quality service and promotional products, as well as Union Made and American Made products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jones Printing Service, Inc.

931 Ventures Way, Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Jones Printing has been delivering exceptional print solutions since 1975, exceeding client expectations with state-of-the-art technology, fast turnaround times, and a commitment to excellence. We’ve built a strong reputation for reliability, quality, and innovation in a highly competitive market. From expert design and high-quality printing to direct mailing services, we’re here to turn your vision into reality.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/special-t-unlimited.jpeg
Special T Unlimited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jones-printing-service-inc.jpeg
Jones Printing Service, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Special T Unlimited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jones Printing Service, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Special T Unlimited in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jones Printing Service, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Special T Unlimited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Special T Unlimited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jones Printing Service, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jones Printing Service, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/special-t-unlimited.jpeg
Special T Unlimited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jones-printing-service-inc.jpeg
Jones Printing Service, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Special T Unlimited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jones Printing Service, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jones Printing Service, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Special T Unlimited company.

In the current year, Jones Printing Service, Inc. company and Special T Unlimited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jones Printing Service, Inc. company nor Special T Unlimited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jones Printing Service, Inc. company nor Special T Unlimited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jones Printing Service, Inc. company nor Special T Unlimited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Special T Unlimited company nor Jones Printing Service, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Jones Printing Service, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Special T Unlimited company nor Jones Printing Service, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jones Printing Service, Inc. company employs more people globally than Special T Unlimited company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Jones Printing Service, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Jones Printing Service, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Jones Printing Service, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Jones Printing Service, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Jones Printing Service, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Jones Printing Service, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L