Comparison Overview

Special T Unlimited

VS

Effective Graphics

Special T Unlimited

4835 West Butterfield Road, Hillside, Illinois, 60162, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.specialtunlimited.com

As with any success story there is a humble beginning. For Special T Unlimited, it begins in 1975 where owner Lou Baldo began printing t-shirts out of his garage in Broadview, IL. The business grew and Lou moved his operation to a shop consisting of 400 square feet. Within three short years the concept had grown so tremendously that once again Special T Unlimited had outgrown its walls. Today the business is housed in a half block facility located in the heart of the community of Hillside, IL. Now, 45 years later, Special T Unlimited has exceeded the screen printing and embroidery needs of thousands of local businesses, corporations, non-profit organizations and countless other clients. Special T Unlimited stands apart by offering their clients quality service and promotional products, as well as Union Made and American Made products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Effective Graphics

19515 S Vermont Ave, Torrance, CA, 90502, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://effectivegraphics.com

Our goal is to provide clients with the most creative, yet practical solutions for their premium retouching, prepress, lithographic and large-format printing and imaging needs. Effective Graphics partners with its clients to enhance their return on marketing investment and the visual expression of their brands. We do this through the skillful integration of our digital imaging expertise with direct marketing, retail and out-of-home solutions. Years of experience with high-end color management ensures accurate brand execution through our prepress, grand format, digital print, lithographic print, mail and fulfillment services.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/special-t-unlimited.jpeg
Special T Unlimited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/effective-graphics.jpeg
Effective Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Special T Unlimited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Effective Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Special T Unlimited in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Effective Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Special T Unlimited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Special T Unlimited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Effective Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Effective Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/special-t-unlimited.jpeg
Special T Unlimited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/effective-graphics.jpeg
Effective Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Effective Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Special T Unlimited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Effective Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Special T Unlimited company.

In the current year, Effective Graphics company and Special T Unlimited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Effective Graphics company nor Special T Unlimited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Effective Graphics company nor Special T Unlimited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Effective Graphics company nor Special T Unlimited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Special T Unlimited company nor Effective Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Effective Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Special T Unlimited company nor Effective Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Effective Graphics company employs more people globally than Special T Unlimited company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Effective Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Effective Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Effective Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Effective Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Effective Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Special T Unlimited nor Effective Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References