Comparison Overview

Spear

VS

Trinity Printing Machinery

Spear

None
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.spearinc.com

Since 1982, Spear, headquartered in Cincinnati, OH USA, has been the world’s leading innovator and supplier of film pressure-sensitive labeling systems. Our labels are found on many of the leading beverage, food and personal care items throughout the world. Spear provides system solutions to labeling needs through expertise in label design, production, application, performance and comprehensive technical support through the SpearSYSTEM™. Our engineered labels withstand pasteurization, hot fill, retort and ice chests to allow for label application at any stage of the distribution process. Spear’s system approach has led to key product development and supply relationships with the leading material and application equipment suppliers in the pressure-sensitive label industry. Material exclusivity, proprietary product performance and pricing advantages are all benefits of Spear’s system supplier network. Spear currently operates 29 printing presses across six facilities in North America (4), Europe and Africa with capacity continually being added to meet expanding demand. Printing processes include flat bed screen, rotary screen, UV flexographic, gravure, foil stamping and combination printing.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 202
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Trinity Printing Machinery

3333 W Kennedy Blvd, Tampa, Florida, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
https://www.usedprintingmachines.com

At Trinity Printing Machinery we are professional, experienced and reputable dealers of used offset printing machinery. We deal with only the finest printing machinery and provide the printing industry with all Printing Machinery Solutions under one roof. With multiple world-wide branches, Trinity has the ability to source printing presses, cutters, folders, saddle stitching lines, die cutters and more from around the globe. We market brands such as Heidelberg, Komori, Ryobi, Muller Martini, Polar, Bobst, MAN Roland, Mitsubishi and many more. We pride ourselves on our ability to provide machines from as-is, where-is condition all the way through complete turn-key installations and everything in between.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spear.jpeg
Spear
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trinity-printing-machinery.jpeg
Trinity Printing Machinery
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Spear
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Trinity Printing Machinery
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spear in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trinity Printing Machinery in 2025.

Incident History — Spear (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spear cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Trinity Printing Machinery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trinity Printing Machinery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spear.jpeg
Spear
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trinity-printing-machinery.jpeg
Trinity Printing Machinery
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Spear company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Trinity Printing Machinery company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Trinity Printing Machinery company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Spear company.

In the current year, Trinity Printing Machinery company and Spear company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Trinity Printing Machinery company nor Spear company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Trinity Printing Machinery company nor Spear company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Trinity Printing Machinery company nor Spear company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Spear company nor Trinity Printing Machinery company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Spear nor Trinity Printing Machinery holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Spear company nor Trinity Printing Machinery company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Spear company employs more people globally than Trinity Printing Machinery company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Spear nor Trinity Printing Machinery holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Spear nor Trinity Printing Machinery holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Spear nor Trinity Printing Machinery holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Spear nor Trinity Printing Machinery holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Spear nor Trinity Printing Machinery holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Spear nor Trinity Printing Machinery holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References