Comparison Overview

Spartan Printing, Inc.

VS

Southern United Ltd

Spartan Printing, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

At Spartan, our philosophy is a very simple, but effective one… to provide the highest quality printing and finishing services at competitive prices with “on-time” delivery. Our goal is to work in partnership with our customers, by making their jobs easier out in the market place. You can be confident we will deliver a quality product in a timely manner. When we succeed in this endeavor, we feel that you and your customer will return to Spartan for your next printing project. By providing consistent service, day in and day out, we are successfully fulfilling our goal.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Southern United Ltd

The Old Brewery, Portslade, BN41 2LE, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Southern United Ltd prides itself in manufacturing the highest quality products. We have been supplying the Aerospace, Defence, Marine, Medical, Electronic, Engineering and Commercial sectors since 1935, all work being carried out in house. As demand for more traceability and manufacturing excellence was surging, the managerial team had decided to invest in obtaining the AS9100 certification, widely recognised by the aerospace industry. We trust that the benefits to our existing and future business partners could be non-negligible. As we are driven by the AS9100 requirements, we strive to achieve excellence on: Product Quality, we regularly achieve a score of 99% right first time, Adhering to drawing specifications, Quote forum and Contract reviews are conducted for every jobs On-time delivery, we currently average at 98% on time delivery. Should you wish to obtain any assistance in regards to our range of products or receive a firm commercial proposal, then please do not hesitate to contact us.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spartan-printing-inc-.jpeg
Spartan Printing, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southern-united-ltd.jpeg
Southern United Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Spartan Printing, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Southern United Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spartan Printing, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern United Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Spartan Printing, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spartan Printing, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Southern United Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern United Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spartan-printing-inc-.jpeg
Spartan Printing, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southern-united-ltd.jpeg
Southern United Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Southern United Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Spartan Printing, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Southern United Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Spartan Printing, Inc. company.

In the current year, Southern United Ltd company and Spartan Printing, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Southern United Ltd company nor Spartan Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Southern United Ltd company nor Spartan Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Southern United Ltd company nor Spartan Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Spartan Printing, Inc. company nor Southern United Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Spartan Printing, Inc. nor Southern United Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Spartan Printing, Inc. company nor Southern United Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Southern United Ltd company employs more people globally than Spartan Printing, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Spartan Printing, Inc. nor Southern United Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Spartan Printing, Inc. nor Southern United Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Spartan Printing, Inc. nor Southern United Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Spartan Printing, Inc. nor Southern United Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Spartan Printing, Inc. nor Southern United Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Spartan Printing, Inc. nor Southern United Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L