Comparison Overview

Sparks Belting Company

VS

Tri-Tronics Company Inc

Sparks Belting Company

5005 Kraft Ave SE, Suite A, Grand Rapids, Michigan, US, 49512
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Providing Innovative Solutions to Customer Needs- For over 75 years! Sparks Belting Company is an internationally recognized conveyor belt manufacturer, fabricator, and distributor. Sparks offers customized conveyor belting, modular plastic belting, urethane timing belts, and motorized pulleys. With a true nationwide footprint, Sparks can take care of your needs regardless of size or location. We stock more than 200 varieties of conveyor belts as well as several "standard"​ Dura-Drive™ Plus pulleys. Sparks can provide you with innovative solutions for your conveyor belting and pulley requirements. Contact us today.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 110
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tri-Tronics Company Inc

7705 Cheri Court, Tampa, FL, 33634, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

At TRI-TRONICS®, we are the trailblazers of high-performance, high-speed sensors, igniting the future of industrial automation and motion feedback control. Our extensive array includes cutting-edge photoelectric and ultrasonic sensors, state-of-the-art fiberoptic light guides, and precision-engineered rotary encoders. For six decades, we have been champions of ingenuity, crafting solutions that transcend the boundaries of the ordinary. Our sensor products deliver unparalleled performance, while the rugged endurance of our encoders sets an industry benchmark. In a world where speed and productivity reign supreme, we understand that performance is the lifeblood of progress. Our company's bedrock is trust, meticulously earned through the test of time. Your success is our compass, and we are here to propel your ambitions to new heights. With TRI-TRONICS®, the journey to excellence is not just a promise but a shared commitment to your triumph. TRI-TRONICS® manufacturing facility is located in Tampa, Florida, in close proximity to Tampa International Airport. We cordially invite you to schedule a visit to our facility on your next business or vacation trip to Florida. We welcome the opportunity to meet our customers in person. Reach out today at www.ttco.com and let us know when you'll be in town.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sparks-belting-company.jpeg
Sparks Belting Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tri-tronics-company-inc.jpeg
Tri-Tronics Company Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sparks Belting Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tri-Tronics Company Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparks Belting Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tri-Tronics Company Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Sparks Belting Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparks Belting Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tri-Tronics Company Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tri-Tronics Company Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sparks-belting-company.jpeg
Sparks Belting Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tri-tronics-company-inc.jpeg
Tri-Tronics Company Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sparks Belting Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tri-Tronics Company Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tri-Tronics Company Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sparks Belting Company company.

In the current year, Tri-Tronics Company Inc company and Sparks Belting Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tri-Tronics Company Inc company nor Sparks Belting Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tri-Tronics Company Inc company nor Sparks Belting Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tri-Tronics Company Inc company nor Sparks Belting Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sparks Belting Company company nor Tri-Tronics Company Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sparks Belting Company nor Tri-Tronics Company Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sparks Belting Company company nor Tri-Tronics Company Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sparks Belting Company company employs more people globally than Tri-Tronics Company Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Sparks Belting Company nor Tri-Tronics Company Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sparks Belting Company nor Tri-Tronics Company Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sparks Belting Company nor Tri-Tronics Company Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sparks Belting Company nor Tri-Tronics Company Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sparks Belting Company nor Tri-Tronics Company Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sparks Belting Company nor Tri-Tronics Company Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H