Comparison Overview

Spark of Creation Therapy

VS

Within Sight

Spark of Creation Therapy

1740 Ridge Road, Evanston, IL, 60201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Spark of Creation Therapy is a consortium of psychotherapists located in Evanston, IL. We provide a "get-it-done" attitude to therapy and work with individuals with a range of symptoms and goals. SPARK clinicians are dedicated to providing emotional support, and when necessary, challenging their patients to move beyond the habits that keep them stuck. In this way, people have the opportunity to experiment with new ways of being and relating to others. Therapy becomes not just a “chat about the news” but a process. It is the process that empowers people to change. People can make the changes they have wanted to make without the pain and difficulty they may have experienced in the past. Our philosophy is quite simple yet sophisticated. Our experienced therapists do whatever it takes to get you or your loved ones feeling better.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Within Sight

915 Main Street, Evansville, 47708, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Within Sight is Your Home for Counseling & Consulting Services. We are setting up this page to provide information about our services and featured events. We also hope to provide information that will inform and inspire about mental health issues. We provide outpatient mental health psychotherapy in a unique home like setting. We treat children, adolescents, and adults in individual, couple, family and group sessions. We also provide medication management of mental health drugs. Our mission is to provide quality and collaborative counseling and consulting services that allow our clients to achieve their best personal and/or professional selves in an environment that supports discovery and connection.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spark-of-creation-therapy.jpeg
Spark of Creation Therapy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/within-sight.jpeg
Within Sight
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Spark of Creation Therapy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Within Sight
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spark of Creation Therapy in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Within Sight in 2026.

Incident History — Spark of Creation Therapy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spark of Creation Therapy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Within Sight (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Within Sight cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spark-of-creation-therapy.jpeg
Spark of Creation Therapy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/within-sight.jpeg
Within Sight
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Spark of Creation Therapy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Within Sight company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Within Sight company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Spark of Creation Therapy company.

In the current year, Within Sight company and Spark of Creation Therapy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Within Sight company nor Spark of Creation Therapy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Within Sight company nor Spark of Creation Therapy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Within Sight company nor Spark of Creation Therapy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Spark of Creation Therapy company nor Within Sight company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Spark of Creation Therapy nor Within Sight holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Spark of Creation Therapy company nor Within Sight company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Within Sight company employs more people globally than Spark of Creation Therapy company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Spark of Creation Therapy nor Within Sight holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Spark of Creation Therapy nor Within Sight holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Spark of Creation Therapy nor Within Sight holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Spark of Creation Therapy nor Within Sight holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Spark of Creation Therapy nor Within Sight holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Spark of Creation Therapy nor Within Sight holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N