Comparison Overview

Sparhawk Group

VS

Bloom Engineering Company

Sparhawk Group

81 Bridge Street, Suite 107, Yarmouth, Maine, 04096, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Sparhawk Group provides a range of consulting services aimed at optimizing building performance and comfort. Your team has a diverse skill set and design the most appropriate solution for each challenge faced. A wide range of services can be utilized together or separately – depending on the specific needs of your site or project. Working together, we’ll create solutions that make operational and financial sense.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bloom Engineering Company

100 Vista Dr, Charleroi, Pennsylvania, 15022, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Bloom Engineering is the leading supplier of high temperature industrial burners and associated combustion equipment. The company has extensive experience in the steel, aluminium and forge industries and also provides combustion equipment for many other applications. We are a combustion oriented company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, serving basic industry with global energy and environmental solutions. The Bloom family of companies specializes in problem solving through custom engineering of industrial burners, combustion systems, controls and refractory products. Bloom has gained a worldwide reputation for quality products, supported by first-class engineering and application expertise. Bloom services include research and development, combustion equipment spare parts.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 126
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sparhawk-group.jpeg
Sparhawk Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bloom-engineering.jpeg
Bloom Engineering Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sparhawk Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bloom Engineering Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparhawk Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bloom Engineering Company in 2025.

Incident History — Sparhawk Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparhawk Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bloom Engineering Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bloom Engineering Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sparhawk-group.jpeg
Sparhawk Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bloom-engineering.jpeg
Bloom Engineering Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sparhawk Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bloom Engineering Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bloom Engineering Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sparhawk Group company.

In the current year, Bloom Engineering Company company and Sparhawk Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bloom Engineering Company company nor Sparhawk Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bloom Engineering Company company nor Sparhawk Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bloom Engineering Company company nor Sparhawk Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sparhawk Group company nor Bloom Engineering Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sparhawk Group nor Bloom Engineering Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sparhawk Group company nor Bloom Engineering Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bloom Engineering Company company employs more people globally than Sparhawk Group company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Sparhawk Group nor Bloom Engineering Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sparhawk Group nor Bloom Engineering Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sparhawk Group nor Bloom Engineering Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sparhawk Group nor Bloom Engineering Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sparhawk Group nor Bloom Engineering Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sparhawk Group nor Bloom Engineering Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H