Comparison Overview

SPAR South Africa

VS

H&M

SPAR South Africa

22 Chancery Lane, Pinetown, 3610, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.SPAR.co.za

There’s something different about shopping at SPAR, that’s because we’ve created a culture of caring and community to ensure our customers have a consistently enjoyable shopping experience in a uniquely friendly and family orientated store. Nothing means more to us than our valued customers and we believe in going the extra mile to give them the best. From sourcing the finest products to providing willing and efficient staff who take a personal interest in our customers’ needs. In the 1960’s a group made up of 8 wholesalers were given exclusive rights to the SPAR name and brand in 1963 and serviced 500 small retailers. Through business acquisitions and organic growth, today the SPAR Group Ltd operates 6 distribution centres and 1 Build it distribution centre (building materials) and 1 pharmaceutical distribution centre (S BUYS), supplying goods and services to more than 2,000 SPAR stores across Southern Africa.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 22,053
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

H&M

Vasagatan 7, Stockholm, Stockholm County, SE, 111 20
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://career.hm.com/

At H&M, we welcome you to be yourself and feel like you truly belong. Help us reimagine the future of an entire industry by making everyone look, feel, and do good. We take pride in our history of making fashion accessible to everyone and led by our values we strive to build a more welcoming, inclusive, and sustainable industry. We are privileged to have more than 120,000 colleagues, in over 75 countries across the world. That’s 120 000 individuals with unique experiences, skills, and passions. At H&M, we believe everyone can make an impact, we believe in giving people responsibility and a strong sense of ownership. Our business is your business, and when you grow, we grow.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 67,647
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spar.jpeg
SPAR South Africa
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/h&m.jpeg
H&M
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SPAR South Africa
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
H&M
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SPAR South Africa in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for H&M in 2025.

Incident History — SPAR South Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SPAR South Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — H&M (X = Date, Y = Severity)

H&M cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spar.jpeg
SPAR South Africa
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/h&m.jpeg
H&M
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

H&M company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SPAR South Africa company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, H&M company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SPAR South Africa company.

In the current year, H&M company and SPAR South Africa company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither H&M company nor SPAR South Africa company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither H&M company nor SPAR South Africa company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither H&M company nor SPAR South Africa company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SPAR South Africa company nor H&M company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SPAR South Africa nor H&M holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

H&M company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SPAR South Africa company.

H&M company employs more people globally than SPAR South Africa company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither SPAR South Africa nor H&M holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SPAR South Africa nor H&M holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SPAR South Africa nor H&M holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SPAR South Africa nor H&M holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SPAR South Africa nor H&M holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SPAR South Africa nor H&M holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References