Comparison Overview

SPAR International

VS

H&M

SPAR International

Rokin 99, Amsterdam, 1012KM, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.spar-international.com

The worldwide SPAR organisation operates more than 13,809 SPAR stores in 48 countries on 4 continents and meets the needs of over 14,7 million consumers every day. The SPAR concept was established on the basis of wholesalers and retailers working in partnership to the benefit of all, including customers. The cornerstone of this partnership is a commitment to the open exchange of knowledge and information. This commitment is a hallmark of the organisation and is intimately connected to the sense of SPAR as a family. Today, SPAR is the world's largest food retail voluntary chain with a rapidly growing presence globally. SPAR located in central Amsterdam is the custodian of the SPAR brand worldwide and unites the scale and resources of the global group, providing strategies and a wide scope of service to grow our brand, our retail operations and our presence worldwide.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 10,156
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

H&M

Vasagatan 7, Stockholm, Stockholm County, SE, 111 20
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://career.hm.com/

At H&M, we welcome you to be yourself and feel like you truly belong. Help us reimagine the future of an entire industry by making everyone look, feel, and do good. We take pride in our history of making fashion accessible to everyone and led by our values we strive to build a more welcoming, inclusive, and sustainable industry. We are privileged to have more than 120,000 colleagues, in over 75 countries across the world. That’s 120 000 individuals with unique experiences, skills, and passions. At H&M, we believe everyone can make an impact, we believe in giving people responsibility and a strong sense of ownership. Our business is your business, and when you grow, we grow.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 67,647
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spar-international.jpeg
SPAR International
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/h&m.jpeg
H&M
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SPAR International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
H&M
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SPAR International in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for H&M in 2025.

Incident History — SPAR International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SPAR International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — H&M (X = Date, Y = Severity)

H&M cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spar-international.jpeg
SPAR International
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/h&m.jpeg
H&M
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

H&M company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SPAR International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, H&M company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SPAR International company.

In the current year, H&M company and SPAR International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither H&M company nor SPAR International company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither H&M company nor SPAR International company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither H&M company nor SPAR International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SPAR International company nor H&M company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SPAR International nor H&M holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

H&M company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SPAR International company.

H&M company employs more people globally than SPAR International company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither SPAR International nor H&M holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SPAR International nor H&M holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SPAR International nor H&M holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SPAR International nor H&M holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SPAR International nor H&M holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SPAR International nor H&M holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References