Comparison Overview

Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP

VS

Page Seager Lawyers

Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP

4675 MacArthur Court, Newport Beach, CA, 92660, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP are the lawyers other firms turn to when they need a higher level of expertise. At trial, and in arbitration, our lawyers litigate sophisticated transactions more successfully because they intimately know today’s complex business structures. Our transactional lawyers make deals work. Both our clients and the business principals on the other side of the table call us thorough, efficient, and effective.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Page Seager Lawyers

Level 2, 179 Murray Street, Hobart, 7000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Page Seager specialises in commercial legal services with a Tasmanian connection. Our client-first approach is backed by a wealth of national expertise and local knowledge. We are home to the largest group of legal professionals in Tasmania, organised into dedicated teams with distinct skillsets. We cater exclusively to corporate entities, government bodies and insurance providers across Australia. Our specialised practice areas are: • Corporate and Commercial • Dispute Resolution • Employment and Safety • Insurance • Property, Planning and Environment • Workers Compensation We take a specialised approach, built on decades of shared experience in top-tier firms, and large public and private organisations. Our talented, passionate people work to ensure that every client achieves their business objectives. The strongest client relationships are built on mutual trust. To earn your trust, we make a point of understanding your goals, while treating your time as precious. Every step of the way, we explain how things work and keep the process on track.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spachcapaldi&waggamanllp.jpeg
Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/page-seager-lawyers.jpeg
Page Seager Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Page Seager Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Page Seager Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Page Seager Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Page Seager Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spachcapaldi&waggamanllp.jpeg
Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/page-seager-lawyers.jpeg
Page Seager Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Page Seager Lawyers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Page Seager Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP company.

In the current year, Page Seager Lawyers company and Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Page Seager Lawyers company nor Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Page Seager Lawyers company nor Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Page Seager Lawyers company nor Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP company nor Page Seager Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP nor Page Seager Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP company nor Page Seager Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Page Seager Lawyers company employs more people globally than Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP nor Page Seager Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP nor Page Seager Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP nor Page Seager Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP nor Page Seager Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP nor Page Seager Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Spach, Capaldi & Waggaman, LLP nor Page Seager Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X