Comparison Overview

Southwest Binding & Laminating

VS

Colonial Press International

Southwest Binding & Laminating

109 Millwell Ct., None, Maryland Heights, MO, US, 63043
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Welcome to Southwest Binding & Laminating Your home for the best in presentation, binding, shrink wrapping, laminating supplies and equipment. When you need to make information "presentable" whether a sales pitch, classroom handouts, corporate materials or family photos, Southwest Binding & Laminating can help you not only with what you need but how to do it! For industry-specific needs, click on the applicable button to the right. For general information on how to laminate or choose the right binding system for you, explore our vast knowledge base of instructional videos, web pages and FAQs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Colonial Press International

3690 NW 50th St, Miami, 33142, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Founded in 1952, Colonial Press is the largest MBE commercial printer in the US. We are a progressively managed company investing in the most modern equipment, technologies and processes to provide our customers the highest levels of service and quality. We enjoy long-term, strategic partnerships with our customers and recognize that they entrust us with their “brand” each time we produce a product. Our Fortune 500 customers know that Colonial Press will deliver to their expectations. Colonial Press operates a 300,000 sq ft manufacturing facility located in Miami Florida offering full service commercial printing. Sheet fed, full web and wide web offset printing, in-house finishing, distribution and comprehensive mailing services. Quality production in a short turnaround time utilizing state of the art equipment. Products include direct mail, brochures, catalogs, directories, newspaper inserts-FSI/shared mail, In-line finished press products, books, posters, annual reports and other advertising/marketing collateral materials. What sets us apart… • Comprehensive manufacturing platform • Wide range of products and services • Competitively priced • Scalable operations, flexible scheduling • Highest quality output • Experienced service and manufacturing staffs • Modern equipment platform • Consistent adherence to customer schedules • Financial stability • Operate as a Tier I or Tier II MBE supplier

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southwest-binding-&-laminating.jpeg
Southwest Binding & Laminating
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colonial-press-international.jpeg
Colonial Press International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Southwest Binding & Laminating
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Colonial Press International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southwest Binding & Laminating in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colonial Press International in 2025.

Incident History — Southwest Binding & Laminating (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southwest Binding & Laminating cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Colonial Press International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colonial Press International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southwest-binding-&-laminating.jpeg
Southwest Binding & Laminating
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colonial-press-international.jpeg
Colonial Press International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Colonial Press International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Southwest Binding & Laminating company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Southwest Binding & Laminating company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Colonial Press International company has not reported any.

In the current year, Colonial Press International company and Southwest Binding & Laminating company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Southwest Binding & Laminating company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Colonial Press International company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Colonial Press International company nor Southwest Binding & Laminating company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Colonial Press International company nor Southwest Binding & Laminating company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Southwest Binding & Laminating company nor Colonial Press International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Southwest Binding & Laminating nor Colonial Press International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Southwest Binding & Laminating company nor Colonial Press International company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Colonial Press International company employs more people globally than Southwest Binding & Laminating company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Southwest Binding & Laminating nor Colonial Press International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Southwest Binding & Laminating nor Colonial Press International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Southwest Binding & Laminating nor Colonial Press International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Southwest Binding & Laminating nor Colonial Press International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Southwest Binding & Laminating nor Colonial Press International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Southwest Binding & Laminating nor Colonial Press International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L