Comparison Overview

Southland Printing Company, Inc.

VS

Applied Image

Southland Printing Company, Inc.

213 Airport Drive, Shreveport, LA, 71107, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.southlandprinting.com

A Rich History. An Exciting Future. For over 60 years, Southland Printing Company, Inc., has been focused on quality. From our tickets to our technology, we serve the parking, transit, event, and commercial printing industries as a trusted and reliable partner. From the press room to the boardroom, Southland Printing Company, Inc., has been fully engaged in the business success of our customers - in all 50 states and over 49 countries. The Future Is Certainly Bright. At Southland Printing Company, Inc., we are well positioned to support our current customers as well as welcome new customers to the Southland Family. We are excited to carry our rich history into the future with a substantial investment in new technology as well as new efforts to share how this technology can improve the business future of our customers. We look forward to an exciting future with you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Applied Image

800 Business Park Dr, Freehold, New Jersey, 07728, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bigres.com

Applied Image is a leader and innovator in the production and installation of large format, architectural and environmental graphics. With a state of the art manufacturing facility, we produce a wide range of product, from the small and simple to the large and complex, in terms of materials, design intent, and processes. From design execution to imaging, fabrication and installation, we consistently exceed the expectations of the country’s most demanding corporate, exhibit and retail designers and architects.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southland-printing-company-inc-.jpeg
Southland Printing Company, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-image-inc-.jpeg
Applied Image
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Southland Printing Company, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Applied Image
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southland Printing Company, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Image in 2025.

Incident History — Southland Printing Company, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southland Printing Company, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Applied Image (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Image cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southland-printing-company-inc-.jpeg
Southland Printing Company, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-image-inc-.jpeg
Applied Image
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Southland Printing Company, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Applied Image company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Applied Image company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Southland Printing Company, Inc. company.

In the current year, Applied Image company and Southland Printing Company, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Applied Image company nor Southland Printing Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Applied Image company nor Southland Printing Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Applied Image company nor Southland Printing Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Southland Printing Company, Inc. company nor Applied Image company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Southland Printing Company, Inc. nor Applied Image holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Southland Printing Company, Inc. company nor Applied Image company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Southland Printing Company, Inc. company employs more people globally than Applied Image company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Southland Printing Company, Inc. nor Applied Image holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Southland Printing Company, Inc. nor Applied Image holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Southland Printing Company, Inc. nor Applied Image holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Southland Printing Company, Inc. nor Applied Image holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Southland Printing Company, Inc. nor Applied Image holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Southland Printing Company, Inc. nor Applied Image holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References