Comparison Overview

SouthernUniversityLawReview

VS

Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC

SouthernUniversityLawReview

2 Roosevelt Steptoe Street, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70813, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Founded in 1974, the Southern University Law Review is a student-published scholarly journal that addresses current legal issues through articles submitted by Southern University law students, and legal scholars and professionals. The Law Review is dedicated to providing judges, lawyers, and law students with effective research materials. Additionally, the Law Review provides its members with the opportunity to develop their own legal writing, editing, and research skills. The Law Review is published twice a year and has a widely circulated subscription list, including availability online through the WESTLAW and LexisNexis databases. The Law Review is always striving to reach new heights of excellence within the legal community, both on a state and national level. To ensure the continuance of an exceptional journal of the highest quality, the Law Review’s Executive Board attends the National Conference of Law Reviews each spring. The Conference serves as a forum for member publications to exchange ideas on issues common to student-edited law journals. We welcome all submissions and do not limit the Law Review to any particular area of law. Citations in the Law Review generally conform to the 19th Edition of The Bluebook and the 16th Edition of the Chicago Manual of Style. The Southern University Law Review adheres to the National Conference of Law Reviews (“NCLR”) Model Code of Ethics.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC

One Liberty Plaza, Ste. 2300, New York, NY, US, 10006-1432
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca is a full-service law firm concentrating in Estate Planning, Estate & Trust Administration, Surrogate’s Court Proceedings, Estate Litigation, Guardianships, and Disability Planning. Tom Sciacca founded our firm in May 2007. We are pleased to focus our practice on: (1) Estate planning (ranging from simple to complex estate planning, estate tax planning, and business succession planning). (2) Estate and Trust administration. (3) Surrogate’s Court proceedings, including litigation in the Surrogate’s Court. (4) Guardianship proceedings in the Supreme and Surrogate’s Courts (routine and contested). (5) Planning for parents with minor or adult disabled children. We represent clients from all walks of life, and of various wealth statuses. We believe that the most essential component of any attorney-client relationship is communication. Does the idea of your attorney returning your telephone calls, sending status e-mails, and keeping you fully informed on your matter surprise you? We don’t think it should. We look forward to changing the way you think about attorneys. Additionally, we are available for appointments on weekends and in the evening to accommodate the busy schedule of both clients and potential clients. We are also available to meet with you at your home or in your office within Manhattan.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southernuniversitylawreview.jpeg
SouthernUniversityLawReview
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-offices-of-thomas-sciacca-pllc.jpeg
Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SouthernUniversityLawReview
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SouthernUniversityLawReview in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — SouthernUniversityLawReview (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SouthernUniversityLawReview cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southernuniversitylawreview.jpeg
SouthernUniversityLawReview
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-offices-of-thomas-sciacca-pllc.jpeg
Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SouthernUniversityLawReview company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SouthernUniversityLawReview company.

In the current year, Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC company and SouthernUniversityLawReview company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC company nor SouthernUniversityLawReview company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC company nor SouthernUniversityLawReview company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC company nor SouthernUniversityLawReview company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SouthernUniversityLawReview company nor Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SouthernUniversityLawReview nor Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SouthernUniversityLawReview company nor Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC company employs more people globally than SouthernUniversityLawReview company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither SouthernUniversityLawReview nor Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SouthernUniversityLawReview nor Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SouthernUniversityLawReview nor Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SouthernUniversityLawReview nor Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SouthernUniversityLawReview nor Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SouthernUniversityLawReview nor Law Offices of Thomas Sciacca, PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X