Comparison Overview

Southern Water Service

VS

UFAB

Southern Water Service

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Manufacturers Representatives for the Water and Wastewater markets... sales, service, replacement parts & new equipment (stock or design-build), from the industries leading water and wastewater PUMP manufacturers. We serve municipalities, motor repair shops, engineering firms and other distributors. Southern Water Service owned by Tony Sanders and is based in Cleveland TN with representation throughout the southeast. Lines include: Barnes, BJM, Crown, EBARA, Goulds, HOMA, Keen, Weinman, Floway Pumps, Sta-Rite / Berkely, Vertiflo, Gusher and more...

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

UFAB

Junogatan 6, Uddevalla, undefined, 451 42, SE
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Continuous improvement is what drives us UFAB has long experience as an OEM supplier and contract manufacturer. Our ­areas of expertise are the development, design, welding, processing and assembly of advanced ­components and machinery systems. Each production solution is optimized for each customer’s specific conditions and needs. We can achieve this thanks to our standardized business systems, simple flows and strong employee commitment, along with our focus on continuous improvement. We are always looking for smarter solutions that are faster, better and more environment-friendly to be able to deliver leaner and greener production for your business. This driving force is exemplified in our brand promise – Always improve. UFAB is a member of the ­Swedish Mattsson Group of Companies. The Mattsson Group consists of well ­positioned companies acting as ­technical system ­suppliers within the following ­business areas: Mechanics, Paper & Board, Marine ­Engineering and Real Estate.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southern-water-service.jpeg
Southern Water Service
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ufab.jpeg
UFAB
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Southern Water Service
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UFAB
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern Water Service in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UFAB in 2025.

Incident History — Southern Water Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern Water Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UFAB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UFAB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southern-water-service.jpeg
Southern Water Service
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ufab.jpeg
UFAB
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Southern Water Service company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UFAB company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, UFAB company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Southern Water Service company.

In the current year, UFAB company and Southern Water Service company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither UFAB company nor Southern Water Service company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither UFAB company nor Southern Water Service company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither UFAB company nor Southern Water Service company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Southern Water Service company nor UFAB company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Southern Water Service nor UFAB holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Southern Water Service company nor UFAB company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

UFAB company employs more people globally than Southern Water Service company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Southern Water Service nor UFAB holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Southern Water Service nor UFAB holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Southern Water Service nor UFAB holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Southern Water Service nor UFAB holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Southern Water Service nor UFAB holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Southern Water Service nor UFAB holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H